Evidence – Case based on circumstantial evidence – Prosecution relied solely on recoveries of articles allegedly looted from the deceased – Conviction u/s.201, s.302 r/w s.34, IPC – Sustainability:
Held: Unsustainable – Impugned judgments quashed, set aside – Neither the disclosure statements of the accused persons were proved as per law nor the prosecution was able to establish the factum of recoveries of articles purported to have been made on the behest of the accused persons by leading proper evidence – Testimony of IO (PW-27) lacks material aspects required to prove the disclosure statement followed by the recovery – There is also material omission on his part in not conducting a Test Identification Parade of the recovered articles, more particularly when the prosecution case was based solely upon recoveries of these articles – Prosecution’s case is weak, not proved beyond reasonable doubt – Chain of circumstantial evidences not so complete, so as to lead to the only hypothesis of the guilt of the accused totally inconsistent with their innocence – Appellants acquitted. [Paras 28, 26, 25, 27, 29]
Murder – Case based solely on circumstantial evidence – Appreciation of evidence – Discussed. [Paras 14, 15]
As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Divya Pandey. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.
This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.