LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/suman-mishra-ors-vs-the-state-of-uttar-pradesh-anr-20250212/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal · Reportable judgment

Suman Mishra & Ors. vs The State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
12 February 2025
Case No.
Criminal Appeal No. 731 of 2025
Result
Allowed
Bench
B.V. Nagarathna, Satish Chandra Sharma
Citation
[2025] 2 S.C.R. 534 : 2025 INSC 203
Acts & Sections
CrPC IPC Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
Supreme Court Reports [2025] 2 S.C.R. 534 : 2025 INSC 203
Issue for consideration
Whether the High Court erred in finding that there were specific allegations in the FIR and Chargesheet even after dropping the charge of Section 376, IPC in order to maintain the criminal proceedings against the Appellants and thus, dismissing the quashing petition filed by them.
Headnote

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.482 – Quashing – FIR inter alia u/ss.498A, 376, IPC and u/ss.3, 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, filed by Respondent No.2-wife against the appellants (husband and in-laws), primarily alleging rape by her brother-in-law – Charge-sheet filed, charges u/s.376, IPC were dropped – Appellants filed quashing petition, dismissed by High Court – Correctness:

Held: Initially, the FIR was lodged alleging rape, however, on investigation no charge-sheet was filed for prosecuting the accused for rape – No protest petition was filed by Respondent No.2 – FIR filed against all the family members about two months after the divorce petition was filed by husband, is vexatious and was instituted with an ulterior motive only because the husband had filed a divorce petition – Allegations against the accused persons were general and omnibus – Divorcing the allegations u/s.376 IPC, nothing remains in the FIR that was specifically alleged against the Appellants – Also, the parties have been granted divorce and the husband has also re-married – High Court undertook only a cursory analysis of the allegations made in the FIR – It failed to underscore any reasons for finding that the allegations made out the alleged offense – In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, FIR and chargesheet quashed. [Paras 12, 13, 14, 19] Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.482 – Quashing – Duty of High Court – Discussed. [Paras 15-16]

Keywords: Quashing · Dropping off of the charges under Section 376, IPC · Non-inclusion of Section 376, IPC in the charge-sheet · No protest petition filed · FIR against all the family members · FIR vexatious · Ulterior motive · Allegations general and omnibus · Husband remarried · Cursory analysis · FIR and the charge-sheet quashed · Peculiar facts and circumstances · Decree of divorce · Re-marriage

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Divya Pandey. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Judgment Satish Chandra Sharma, J. 1. Leave Granted. 2. The present appeal is arising out of order dated 31.08.2022 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (“CrPC”) being Application under Section 482 No. 23358 of 2022, whereby the High Court has dismissed the quashing application preferred by the present Appellants for quashing of the Chargesheet dated 02.02.2022 and the cognizance order dated 28.03.2022 passed by the Court of ACJM, Bareilly in FIR No. 733 of 2021 registered under Sections 498A, 504, 50
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →