LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/subhechha-welfare-society-vs-m-s-earth-infrastructure-pvt-ltd-20200214/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Subhechha Welfare Society vs M/s. Earth Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
14 February 2020
Case No.
Civil Appeal Nos.9961-9962 of 2017
Bench
Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, R. Subhash Reddy
Citation
[2020] 3 S.C.R. 811 : 2020 INSC 189
Supreme Court Reports [2020] 3 S.C.R. 811 : 2020 INSC 189
Headnote

Consumer Protection Act, 1986: s.12 – Recognised consumer association – Composite complaint filed by a registered welfare society on behalf of more than one consumers having grievance that they booked units with the opposite party on different dates and inspite of making major payment, possession was not delivered to them – Complaints dismissed on the ground that recognised consumer association can file complaint on behalf of single consumer only but cannot file complaint on behalf of several consumers in one complaint – On appeal, held: s.12(1)(b) r/w Explanation to s.12 envisages that voluntary registered association can file a complaint on behalf of its members to espouse their grievances – There is nothing in the said provision of the Act which restrict its application to the complaint pertaining to an individual complainant – Impugned order is, therefore, set aside and matter remitted to NCDRC for consideration afresh.

Allowing the appeals and remitting the matter to NCDRC, the Court

HELD: 1. The finding of the NCDRC that recognised consumer association can file complaint on behalf of a single consumer, but cannot file complaint on behalf of several consumers in one complaint, is erroneous and there is no legal basis for that. A reading of Section 12(1)(b) of the Act read with Explanation to Section 12 is clear that voluntary registered association can file a complaint on behalf of its members to espouse their grievances. If a recognised consumer association is made to file multiple complaints in respect of several consumers having a similar cause of action, that would defeat the very purpose. [Para 7][813 F-H; 814-A]

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by R. SUBHASH REDDY, J. 1. These civil appeals are filed by the complainant in Consumer Complaint Nos.1196 and 1197 of 2016, aggrieved by the order dated 06.12.2016 and the order dated 05.01.2017 in R.A.Nos.312 and 313 of 2016 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (for short, ‘NCDRC’), New Delhi. 2. The appellant-complainant is a registered Welfare Society. Consumer Complaint No.1196 of 2016 has been filed by the complainant on behalf of 8 allottees and Consumer Complaint No.1197 of 2016 has been filed by the complainant on beh
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →