LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/shakeel-ahmed-vs-syed-akhlaq-hussain-20231101/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Shakeel Ahmed vs Syed Akhlaq Hussain

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
1 November 2023
Case No.
Civil Appeal No.1598 of 2023
Result
Allowed
Bench
Vikram Nath, Rajesh Bindal
Citation
[2023] 15 S.C.R. 590 : 2023 INSC 1016
Supreme Court Reports [2023] 15 S.C.R. 590 : 2023 INSC 1016
Issue for consideration
High Court whether justified in affirming the judgment of the Trial Court whereby it decreed the suit for possession and mesne profits filed by the respondent with respect to the property in question on the basis of unregistered documents namely a Power of Attorney, an agreement to sell, an affidavit and a will.
Headnote

Deeds and Documents– Unregistered documents – Title with respect to immovable properties, if could be transferred on the basis of unregistered documents:

Held: No title could be transferred with respect to immovable properties on the basis of an unregistered Agreement to Sell or on the basis of an unregistered General Power of Attorney – The Registration Act, 1908 clearly provides that a document which requires compulsory registration under the Act, would not confer any right, much less a legally enforceable right to approach a Court of Law on its basis – Even if the Agreement to Sell and the Power of Attorney were registered, still it could not be said that the respondent would have acquired title over the property in question – No right, title or interest in immovable property can be conferred without a registered document – The judgment of this Court in the case of Suraj Lamps & Industries case lays down the same proposition – The embargo put on registration of documents would not override the statutory provision so as to confer title on the basis of unregistered documents w.r.t immovable property – Argument advanced on behalf of the respondent that the judgment in Suraj Lamps & Industries would be prospective is also misplaced – The requirement of compulsory registration and effect on nonregistration emanates from the Registration Act and the Transfer of Property Act – Ratio in Suraj Lamps & Industries only approves the provisions in the two enactments – Earlier judgments of this Court have taken the same view – Respondent could not have maintained the suit for possession and mesne profits against the appellant, who was admittedly in possession of the property in question whether as an owner or a licensee – Impugned judgment set aside, suit dismissed – Registration Act, 1908 – ss.17, 49 – Transfer of Property Act, 1882 – s.54.

LIST OF CITATIONS AND OTHER REFERENCES

Suraj Lamps & Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Haryana and Anr 183 (2011) DLT 1 (SC); Ameer Minhaj Vs. Deirdre Elizabeth (Wright) Issar and Others (2018) 7 SCC 639 : [2018] 5 SCR 173; Balram Singh Vs. Kelo Devi Civil Appeal No. 6733 of 2022; M/S Paul Rubber Industries Private Limited Vs. Amit Chand Mitra & Anr SLP (C) No. 15774 of 2022 – referred to. OTHER CASE DETAILS INCLUDING IMPUGNED

ORDER AND APPEARANCES

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

JUDGMENT / ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT ORDER VIKRAM NATH, J. 1. This appeal assails the correctness of the judgment and order dated 23.08.2018 passed by the High Court of Delhi in RFA No.191 of 2013 between Shakeel Ahmed and Syed Akhlaq Hussain, whereby the appeal was dismissed and the judgment and decree of the Trial Court decreeing the suit for possession and mesne profits has been affirmed. 2. The appellant is defendant in the suit for possession and mesne profits instituted by the respondent with respect to the property in question. The suit was filed on the basis of a Power of Attorney
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →