LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/directorate-of-enforcement-vs-niraj-tyagi-ors-20240213/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal · Reportable judgment

Directorate of Enforcement vs Niraj Tyagi & Ors.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
13 February 2024
Case No.
Criminal Appeal No. 843 of 2024
Bench
Bela M. Trivedi
Citation
[2024] 2 S.C.R. 311 : 2024 INSC 106
Acts & Sections
CrPC Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002
Supreme Court Reports [2024] 2 S.C.R. 311 : 2024 INSC 106
Issue for consideration
Interim orders passed by the High Court staying the investigations of the FIRs and the Enforcement Directorate, if justified.
Headnote

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s. 482 – Powers of the High Court under – Banking financial institution sanctioned loan facilities to the borrowers, however, the borrowers defaulted – Banking institution auctioned the property and sold the shares of the borrowers for the recovery of its dues – Registration of FIR by the borrowers against the Banking institution and its officers, and investigation by the Enforcement Directorate – Writ petition before the High Court by the officers seeking quashing of FIR and as also consequential proceedings arising therefrom – Orders passed by the High Court staying the investigations of the FIRs and ECIR and restrained the investigating agencies from investigating into the cognizable offences as alleged in the FIRs and the ECIR – Propriety:

Held: Inherent powers u/s. 482 do not confer any arbitrary jurisdiction on the High Court to act according to whims or caprice – Statutory power has to be exercised sparingly with circumspection and in the rarest of rare cases – Said order passed in utter disregard of the settled legal position – Without undermining the powers of the High Court u/s. 482 to quash the proceedings if the allegations made in the FIR or complaint prima facie do not constitute any offence against the accused, or if the criminal proceedings are found to be manifestly malafide or malicious, instituted with ulterior motive etc., the High Court could not have stayed the investigations and restrained the investigating agencies from investigating into the cognizable offences as alleged in the FIRs and the ECIR, particularly when the investigations were at a very nascent stage – In a way, by passing such orders of staying the investigations and restraining the investigating agencies from taking any coercive measure against the accused pending the petitions u/s. 482, the High Court granted blanket orders restraining the arrest without the accused applying for the anticipatory bail – Thus, the impugned orders passed by the High Court being not in consonance with the legal position, set aside – Impugned interim orders passed by the High Court qua the accused stands vacated. [Paras 20, 23-25]

Judicial discipline – Principle of:

Read the full headnote (1 more paragraph)

Held: Judicial discipline and Judicial comity and demands that higher courts should follow the law – Extraordinary and inherent powers of the court do not confer any arbitrary jurisdiction on the court to act according to its whims and caprice. [Paras 24, 25]

Keywords: Quashing of FIR · Staying the investigations · Powers of the High Court · Malafide or malicious criminal proceedings · Investigating agencies · Enforcement Directorate · Inherent powers · Judicial comity · Judicial discipline · Extraordinary powers · Money laundering

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Judgment Bela M. Trivedi, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The appellants being aggrieved by the interim orders dated 13.07.2023, 08.08.2023 and 13.09.2023 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition Nos. 10893/2023, 11837/2023 and 14053/2023 respectively, have preferred the instant appeals. Vide the impugned orders, the High Court has stayed the proceedings of the FIRs registered against the concerned respondents-accused as also stayed the proceedings of ECIR No.ECIR/HIU-I/06/2023 registered by the Directorate of Enforcement against the concerned respondents,
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →