LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/bhaggi-bhagirath-naran-vs-the-state-of-madhya-pradesh-20240205/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal · Reportable judgment

Bhaggi @ Bhagirath @ Naran vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
5 February 2024
Case No.
Special Leave Petition (Crl). 2888 of 2023
Result
Partly allowed
Bench
C.T. Ravikumar, Rajesh Bindal
Citation
[2024] 2 S.C.R. 111 : 2024 INSC 82
Acts & Sections
IPC CrPC Protection of Children from Sexual Offences…
Supreme Court Reports [2024] 2 S.C.R. 111 : 2024 INSC 82
Issue for consideration
The capital punishment awarded to the petitioner-convict for the conviction u/s. 376 AB, IPC was not confirmed and it was commuted to imprisonment for life, which, going by the provisions thereunder, means imprisonment for the remainder of the convict’s natural life. The only question is whether the commutation of capital punishment to sentence of life imprisonment requires further interference.
Headnote

Sentence/Sentencing – Modification of sentence – Allegation that petitioner-convict took 7 year old girl to a temple and raped her – Trial Court convicted petitioner u/s. 376 AB – Though, the petitioner was also convicted u/s. 376 (2) (i) and u/ss. 3/4, s. 5(d)/6 of the POCSO Act taking note of his conviction u/s. 376 AB, IPC, no separate sentences were awarded for the aforesaid offences by the trial Court – The High Court commuted it to imprisonment for life – Propriety: Held: The evidence would reveal that unmindful of the holiness of the place petitioner disrobed victim and himself and raped her – When such an act was done by the petitioner, who was then aged

40 years and X who was then aged only 7 years and the evidence that when PW-2 and PW-14 reached the place of occurrence, blood was found oozing from the private parts of the disrobed child – The High Court had rightly considered the aggravating and mitigating circumstances while commuting the capital sentence into life imprisonment which going by the provisions u/s. 376 AB, IPC means rest of the convict’s natural life – For effecting such commutation, the High Court also considered the question whether there is possibility for reformation and rehabilitation of the petitioner and opined that it is not a case in which the alternative punishment would not be sufficient in the facts of the case – But then, it is noted that if the victim is religious every visit to any temple may hark back to her the unfortunate, barbaric action to which she was subjected to – So also, the incident may haunt her and adversely impact in her future married life – On consideration of all such aspects, a fixed term of sentence of 30 years, which shall include the period already undergone, must be the modified sentence of imprisonment – The convict is also liable to suffer a sentence of fine which shall be just and reasonable to meet the medical expenses and rehabilitation of the victim which is quantified as Rupees One Lakh and the same shall be paid to the victim with respect to the conviction u/s. 363, IPC. [Paras 15, 16, 17]

Keywords: Sentence · Sentencing · Modification of sentence · Fixed term of sentence · Capital Punishment · Capital Punishment commuted to imprisonment for life · Rape of a minor · Fine · Medical expenses and rehabilitation of the victim

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Order 1. The petitioner-convict seeks to assail the judgment dated 11.10.2018 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in Criminal Appeal No. 5725 of 2018. 2. In troth, it is a common judgment in Criminal Reference No.6/2018 submitted by the Trial Court under Section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.PC) for confirmation of the conviction under Section 376 AB of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) as amended by Act No. 22 of 2018 and in Criminal Appeal No. 5725 of 2018 filed by the petitioner-convict herein aggrieved by the conviction and sentence imposed against him for c
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →