LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/state-of-haryana-vs-anand-singh-20260708/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal

State Of Haryana vs Anand Singh

Court
Punjab & Haryana High Court
Date
8 July 2026
Case No.
MRC-6-2023 & CRA-D-1055-2023
Bench
Anoop Chitkara J, Ramesh Chander Dimri J
Acts & Sections
IPC §302 IPC §363 IPC §366A IPC §376 IPC §365 IPC §346
Headnote AI-drafted · Reviewed and approved
The Sessions Court convicted Anand Singh for the rape and murder of a six-year-old girl ('Laadli') and sentenced him to death under Section 302 IPC and Section 6 of the POCSO Act, along with rigorous imprisonment for seven years each under Sections 363 and 201 IPC. The trial court made a reference to the High Court under Section 366 CrPC for confirmation of the death sentence, while the convict also filed a criminal appeal under Section 374(2) CrPC challenging his conviction and sentence.

The facts established that on May 24, 2021, the convict, aged 27, took advantage of the victim's parents' absence for work and abducted the child from a tile plant in Palwal, Haryana. He took her to an isolated agricultural field where he brutally raped her at both orifices, throttled her to death, and concealed her dead body in a pit. The convict was arrested the next day and led the police to the concealed body pursuant to a disclosure statement. Scientific and forensic evidence including crime scene inspection, photographs, and medical examination corroborated the prosecution's case.

The High Court took up both the murder reference (MRC-6-2023) and the criminal appeal (CRA-D-1055-2023) together for consideration. The case involves examination of whether the offences fall within the 'rarest of rare' category warranting confirmation of the capital punishment awarded by the Sessions Court, and assessment of the entire evidence on record including the disclosure statement, recovery of the dead body, forensic evidence, and medical findings.
Catchwords: death sentence confirmation · murder reference · rape and murder of minor · POCSO · rarest of rare · kidnapping · concealment of evidence · child victim · capital punishment · disclosure statement · forensic evidence · SC/ST Act

Headnote © LegalFirms.in. Section 52(1)(q)(iv) of the Copyright Act, 1957 allows a court's judgment to be reproduced unless the court has prohibited it.

Full Judgment Text

[Cites 68, Cited by 0] Punjab-Haryana High Court State Of Haryana vs Anand Singh on 8 July, 2026 Author: Anoop Chitkara Bench: Anoop Chitkara MRC-6-2023 & CRA-D-1055-2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH MRC-6-2023 & CRA-D-1055-2023 State of Haryana ...Appellant Versus Anand Singh ...Respondent JUDGMENT JUDGMENT OPERATIVE PART UPLOADED RESERVED ON PRONOUNCED ON PRONOUNCED OR FULL ON 01.07.2026 08.07.2026 FULL PRONOUNCED 08.07.2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI Present: Mr. Yuvraj Shandilya,
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All P&H HC judgments →
⚖ LegalFirms.in Directory
Find a verified advocate for this matter
Dealing with a similar case? Connect with a verified advocate on LegalFirms.in.
Find an Advocate →