LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/wyeth-limited-ors-vs-state-of-bihar-anr-20220811/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal · Reportable judgment

Wyeth Limited & Ors. vs State of Bihar & Anr.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
11 August 2022
Case No.
Criminal Appeal No. 1224 of 2022
Result
Allowed
Bench
Indira Banerjee, V. Ramasubramanian
Citation
[2022] 6 S.C.R. 1132 : 2022 INSC 1316
Supreme Court Reports [2022] 6 S.C.R. 1132 : 2022 INSC 1316
Headnote

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s. 482 – Quashing of FIR/complaint – When – Held: Complaint is to be quashed when no offence is made out by a careful reading of the complaint – On facts, respondent no. 2 filed private complaint u/s. 200 Cr.P.C, which was referred by the court u/s. 156(3) to the police for registration of FIR against the appellants u/ss. 406, 420, 408, 460, 471, 384, 311, 193, 196/120-B IPC – Reading of the complaint, shows that none of the ingredients of any of the offences complained against the appellants made out, thus, it cannot be said that how FIR was registered and charge-sheet was filed – Complaint itself disclosed nothing more than a commercial relationship which broke, as such it was not possible for respondent No.2 to enlarge the scope of his complaint by merely adding the language used in the text of the Penal Code – Furthermore, the appellant No.1 had instituted a civil suit against the respondent, obtained an order for the appointment of a Court Receiver; and also lodged a criminal complaint, which the High Court refused to quashed; and it is only thereafter the respondent No.2 chose to file the said complaint – Also, the High Court erred in overlooking the application for bringing on record the subsequent development of the filing of the charge-sheet and the prayer for inclusion of the relief of quashing of the chargesheet in the original petition – Thus, the FIR and the charge-sheet against the appellants quashed.

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN 1. Leave granted. 2. Aggrieved by an order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Patna dismissing a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short “Cr.P.C”) for quashing an FIR registered at the instance of the second respondent herein, the appellants have come up with the above appeal. 3. Heard the learned senior counsel appearing for the appellants, the learned standing counsel for the State of Bihar and the learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.2, who was the comp
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →