Bail– Appellant was on interim bail on account of order dtd. 02.09.2022 passed by Supreme Court – By the impugned order, High Court rejected the bail application filed by the appellant and directed the appellant to surrender immediately – Legality of – Held: There was no alarming urgency to direct the appellant to surrender immediately when she was enjoying the interim protection under the orders of Supreme Court – The considerations which were available when the order dtd.02.09.2022 was passed are still available even at this stage – Most of the evidence in the present case are documentary evidence already in possession of the Investigating Agency and the charge-sheet has been filed – Appellant entitled for bail – Impugned order quashed and set aside – Appellant would not make any attempt to influence the witnesses and shall remain away from them – Penal Code, 1860 – ss.468, 469, 471, 194, 211, 218 and 120B.
Zakia Ahsan Jafri v. State of Gujarat and another 2022
(9) SCALE 385; Niranjan Singh and Another v. Prabhakar Rajaram Kharote and Others (1980) 2 SCC
559 : [1980] 3 SCR 15 – referred to.
As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.
This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.