LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/suraj-singh-gujar-anr-vs-the-state-of-madhya-pradesh-ors-20240830/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal · Reportable judgment

Suraj Singh Gujar & Anr. vs The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
30 August 2024
Case No.
Criminal Appeal No. 3731 of 2024
Result
Disposed
Bench
Sudhanshu Dhulia, Ahsanuddin Amanullah
Citation
[2024] 8 S.C.R. 782 : 2024 INSC 661
Acts & Sections
IPC Constitution
Supreme Court Reports [2024] 8 S.C.R. 782 : 2024 INSC 661
Issue for consideration
Appellants were convicted by the Trial Court u/ss.323, 324 and

325 r/w. s.34 of IPC. It is stated by the appellants that they have settled the dispute with the injured persons vide compromise deed dated 29.01.2024. In the instant appeal, they are seeking permission of the Court for compounding the offence.
Headnote

Penal Code, 1860 – ss.323, 324 and 325 r/w. s.34 – Constitution of India – Art.142 – Incident between relatives – Conviction under non-compoundable offences set aside:

Held: On perusal of affidavits filed, this Court found that since the appellants are the cousin of respondents no.2 and 3 and have tendered an unconditional apology regarding the incident, these respondents have agreed to compound the offence – A similar stand has been taken by respondent no. 4, who is the uncle of the appellants – As far as Sections 323 and 325 of the IPC are concerned, offences under these provisions are compoundable but the offence under Section 324 of the IPC is a non-compoundable offence – In a series of cases, considering that the incident occurred between relatives and the incident is of such a nature which did not have much impact on society, this Court had set aside the conviction by invoking its power under Article 142 of the Constitution in matters involving non-compoundable offences – However, this is to be done only in exceptional cases after considering various factors including the nature of injuries, relation between parties and the impact of crime on society, etc – In instant case, the incident occurred on 20.05.2011 relating to a minor issue where respondent no.2 was trying to tie bullocks to which the appellants objected by saying that it was their land – As is clear from the compromise, the appellants and complainant side are close relatives and after settling their disputes, both sides have agreed to maintain peace and harmony in the society – Taking all of this into account, the powers under Article 142 of the Constitution are invoked and the conviction of appellants in the present case are set aside. [Paras 4, 5, 6, 7]

Keywords: Section 323 of Penal Code, 1860 · Section 324 of Penal Code, 1860 · Section 325 of Penal Code, 1860 · Settlement of dispute · Compromise between the parties · Compoundable offence · Non-compoundable offence · Nature of injuries · Incident between relatives · Article 142 of the Constitution

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Ankit Gyan. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Order Leave granted. 2. The appellants have been convicted by the Trial Court under Sections 323, 324 and 325 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months, six months and one year for respective offences. Vide the impugned order dated 26.12.2023, Madhya Pradesh High Court disposed of the criminal appeal of appellants by maintaining their conviction and sentence as awarded by the Trial Court. 3. Now, the appellants have filed the present appeal stating that they have settled the dispute with the injured persons vide a Compromis
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →