LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/sunita-ors-vs-vinod-singh-ors-20250319/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Sunita & Ors. vs Vinod Singh & Ors.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
19 March 2025
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 4021 of 2025
Result
Allowed
Bench
Sudhanshu Dhulia, Ahsanuddin Amanullah
Citation
[2025] 3 S.C.R. 811 : 2025 INSC 366
Acts & Sections
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
Supreme Court Reports [2025] 3 S.C.R. 811 : 2025 INSC 366
Issue for consideration
Matter pertains to the adequacy of compensation granted to the appellants under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Headnote

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 – Fatal accident – Compensation – Computation of – Victim crushed to death by the offending truck being driven by respondent no.1 in a rash and negligent manner – Appellant’s case that the deceased was aged about

45 years at the time of her death and was earning a monthly income of Rs.10,000/- – Claim petition – Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs.4,31,680/- which was enhanced by the High Court to Rs.5,96,761/- – Correctness:

Held: Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 is a beneficial and welfare legislation and it is the duty of the Court to award ‘just compensation’ – Monthly income coming to Rs.7,637/- rounded off at Rs.7000/- – Sufficient indication that the deceased was aged about 45 years as per the Post-Mortem Report which is a scientific assessment of the age of the deceased – Multiplier of 14 granted taking her age as 45 years – For loss of love and affection, Rs.40,000/- per head with escalation of 10% every three years of loss of consortium, granted to five claimants as per formula approved – Expenses for funeral and transportation increased from Rs.10,000/- to 20,000/- – Loss of future prospects assessed at 25% – Courts below took the deduction for personal expenses to be 1/5th, however, the same is taken to be 1/4th and the compensation is quantified – Total compensation of Rs.13,82,500/- awarded with 7.5% interest per annum which would be pro rata if any amount has been paid – Impugned judgment set aside. [Paras 11, 12, 14-17]

Keywords: Compensation · Multiplier · Deduction for personal expenses · Monthly income · Loss of dependency · Expenses for funeral and transportation · Loss of love and affection · Loss of care and guidance of minors · Loss of estate · Notional wages as home maker · Multiplier factor dependent on age · Scientific assessment of age · Discrepancy in age · Loss of future prospects · Just compensation

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Nidhi Jain. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Judgment Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. Leave granted. 2. The present appeal mounts a challenge to the Final Judgment and Order dated 24.05.2018 in FAO No.3026/2016 (O&M) (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Impugned Order’) passed by a learned Single Bench of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh (hereinafter referred to as the ‘High Court’), whereby the appeal filed by the appellants was partly allowed and the compensation awarded by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bhiwani (hereinafter referred to as the ‘MACT’) was enhanced from Rs.4,31,680/- (Rupees Four Lakhs Thirty-One Th
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →