LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/state-of-madhya-pradesh-vs-ramji-lal-sharma-another-20240923/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal · Reportable judgment

State of Madhya Pradesh vs Ramji Lal Sharma & Another

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
23 September 2024
Case No.
Miscellaneous Application No. 261 of 2024 in Criminal Appeal No. 293 of 2022
Result
Allowed
Bench
B.V. Nagarathna, N Kotiswar Singh
Citation
[2024] 10 S.C.R. 411 : 2024 INSC 747
Acts & Sections
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of… IPC Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes…
Supreme Court Reports [2024] 10 S.C.R. 411 : 2024 INSC 747
Issue for consideration
Matter pertains to the application filed by applicant seeking his release from further jail sentence, on the ground of his juvenility on the date of the offence and has already undergone a sentence of more than four years.
Headnote

Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 – s.94 – Presumption and determination of age – As regards incident of 17.01.2002, the applicant convicted by the Special Sessions Judge, however, acquitted by the High Court – Subsequently, this Court convicted the applicant – Thereafter the applicant underwent sentence of four years and three months in all – Subsequently, miscellaneous application filed by the applicant seeking his release from further jail sentence, on the ground of his juvenility on the date of the offence and has already undergone a sentence of more than four years:

Held: Application for claiming juvenility may be made even after the judgment and order of conviction and sentence has been granted against a person which has attained finality – On basis of the report submitted by the Sessions Judge, pursuant to the directions of this Court, it is found that the applicant was below eighteen years of age as on the date of the incident – Date of birth of the applicant has been proved to be 04.10.1984 – Thus, the claim of juvenility made by the applicant, upheld – Conviction as recorded against him set aside and he is acquitted – As he is on interim bail, his bail-bonds stand cancelled. [Para 11]

Keywords: Release from further jail sentence · Juvenility · Date of birth

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Nidhi Jain. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Judgment Nagarathna, J. The Applicant/Respondent No. 2 herein, i.e., Brijnandan @ Brajesh Sharma has filed the present Miscellaneous Application in the disposed of Criminal Appeal No.293 of 2002. seeking his release from further jail sentence, on the ground of his juvenility on the date of the offence, i.e., on 17.01.2002. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the Respondents in Criminal Appeal No.293 of 2022 were two of the four accused in the crime registered pursuant to FIR No.8/2002 dated 17.01.2002 at Police Station AJK Bhind, District Bhinda, Madhya Pradesh, for the offenc
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →