LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/state-of-karnataka-vs-srinivasa-20180814/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal · Reportable judgment

State of Karnataka vs Srinivasa

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
14 August 2018
Case No.
Criminal Appeal No. 1496 of 2013
Result
Dismissed
Bench
R. Banumathi, Vineet Saran
Citation
[2018] 10 S.C.R. 919 : 2018 INSC 703
Supreme Court Reports [2018] 10 S.C.R. 919 : 2018 INSC 703
Headnote

Penal Code, 1860: s.302 – Death caused by hanging – Prosecution case was that the accused-husband and deceased-wife used to have altercation on account of illicit relationship of accusedhusband with accused no.2 – On the fateful day, deceased was found hanging with telephone wire – Trial court convicted the accused-husband under s.302 – High Court acquitted the accused relying on the evidence of the doctor to the effect that it was a case of suicide as the ligature marks were not found on the neck – State’s appeal against acquittal – Scope of interference with the order of the High Court – Held: High Court accepted the evidence of the doctor – High Court appreciated oral and medical evidence and acquitted the accused – The view of High Court was plausible one – No reason to interfere with the order of High Court. Dismissing the appeal, the Court

HELD: When the doctor gave opinion that the suicide cannot be ruled out and the death of the deceased could have been due to suicide which was accepted by the High Court; when the High Court has a view which is a plausible view, there is no ground to take a different view. There is no compelling reason or substantial ground to interfere with the order of acquittal. [Para 6] [921-C-D]

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by R. BANUMATHI, J. 1. The appeal by the State of Karnataka is against the acquittal of respondent-accused under section 302 IPC. 2. Case of the prosecution is that A-1 was allegedly having illicit relationship with second accused (since dead). On account of which there was altercation between A-1 (respondent) and the deceased Rajashree (wife) and the accused no. 1 is alleged to have strangulated the deceased to death. Relying upon the medical evidence (PW-7) and the evidence of PW-8 (father of the deceased), the trial Court convicted respondent no.1 u
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →