LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/state-of-chhattisgarh-and-anr-vs-m-s-kmc-construction-limited-20180418/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

State of Chhattisgarh and Anr. vs M/s. Kmc Construction Limited

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
18 April 2018
Case No.
Civil appeal No. 4257 of 2018
Result
Disposed
Bench
Adarsh Kumar Goel, R.F. Nariman
Citation
[2018] 4 S.C.R. 270 : 2018 INSC 360
Supreme Court Reports [2018] 4 S.C.R. 270 : 2018 INSC 360
Headnote

Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983:

Jurisdiction of Arbitration Tribunal – Held: The Arbitration Tribunal constituted under the Act has the exclusive jurisdiction to deal with the dispute in question – Impugned direction set aside – Matter relegated to the Arbitration Tribunal constituted under the Act.

Madhya Pradesh Rural Road Development Authority and Anr. v. L.G. Chaudhary Engineers and Contractors (2012) 2 SCC 495 : [2012] 2 SCR 162 – relied on.

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The following Order of the Court was passed: ORDER 1. Delay condoned. Leave granted. 2. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. In view of judgment of this Court in Madhya Pradesh Rural Road Development Authority and Anr. v. L.G. Chaudhary Engineers and Contractors, (2012) 3 SCC 495 and the order passed by this Court on 8th March, 2018 in the same matter, the M.P. Arbitration Tribunal constituted under the M.P. Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983, (M.P. Act) has the exclusive jurisdiction to deal with the dispute in question. Accordingly, the impugned dir
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →