LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/shoor-singh-anr-vs-state-of-uttarakhand-20240920/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal · Reportable judgment

Shoor Singh & Anr. vs State of Uttarakhand

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
20 September 2024
Case No.
Criminal Appeal No. 249 of 2013
Result
Allowed
Bench
J.B. Pardiwala, Manoj Misra
Citation
[2024] 9 S.C.R. 818 : 2024 INSC 713
Acts & Sections
IPC Evidence Act CrPC Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961
Supreme Court Reports [2024] 9 S.C.R. 818 : 2024 INSC 713
Issue for consideration
High Court, if justified in acquitting the parents-in-laws and the husband of the victim-daughter-in-law of the offences punishable u/ss.304-B and 498-A IPC.
Headnote

Penal Code, 1860 – ss.304-B and 498-A – Evidence Act, 1872 – s.113-B – Dowry death – Presumption as to dowry death u/s.113-B – Victim-daughter-in-law died of burn injuries at her matrimonial home within one year of marriage – FIR by the father that his daughter was harassed by the appellants-parentin-laws and husband soon before her death in connection with dowry demand – Order of conviction and sentence of the appellants u/ss.304-B and 498-A – However, the High Court upholding the order of conviction, reduced the sentence from

Read the full headnote (3 more paragraphs)

10 years to 7 years R.I. u/s.304-B IPC while maintained the sentence of 1 year R.I. u/s.498-A – Justification: Held: Distinction must be drawn between admissibility and acceptability/reliability of a piece of evidence – Merely because a piece of evidence is admissible does not mean that it must be accepted – Before accepting the evidence to hold that the fact in issue stands proved beyond reasonable doubt, the Court must evaluate the same against the weight of surrounding circumstances and other facts proven on record – On facts, one of the essential ingredients of dowry death, namely any demand for dowry, not proved beyond reasonable doubt – Accused have not been convicted for murder, and rightly so, because no worthwhile evidence to show that except for the burn injuries, which could be self-inflicted, the victim suffered any other antemortem injury – Moreover, the presence of the accused in the house at the time of occurrence not proved – In such circumstances, the death was most probably suicidal though this would not make a difference for commission of an offence punishable u/s.304-B if all the other ingredients of dowry death stand proved – Harassment/ cruelty at the instance of the appellants in connection with any demand for dowry not been proved beyond reasonable doubt – Reason to commit suicide could be that the deceased used to remain depressed for being unable to join her husband at the place of his posting, and photograph of hers’, showing her alone with a male stranger had shamed her – Once all the necessary ingredients of dowry death not been proved beyond reasonable doubt, the presumption u/s.113-B of the 1872 Act would not be available to the prosecution – Thus, the appellants entitled to be acquitted of the charge of offences punishable u/ss.304-B and 498-A – Conviction and sentence of the appellants u/ss.304-B and 498-A set aside. [Paras 14 to 19] Penal Code, 1860 - s.304 – Dowry death – Ingredients to be satisfied to constitute a ‘dowry death’, punishable u/s.304-B – Stated. [Para 12]

Evidence Act, 1872 – s.113-B – Presumption as to dowry death – When:

Held: When all the ingredients of ‘dowry death’ punishable u/s.304-B IPC, are proved, the presumption u/s.113-B is to be raised against the accused that he has committed the offence of ‘dowry death’ – Presumption u/s.113-B is not in respect of commission of an act of cruelty, or harassment, in connection with any demand for dowry, which is one of the essential ingredients of the offence of ‘dowry death’ – Presumption, however, is in respect of commission of the offence of ‘dowry death’ by the accused when all the essential ingredients of ‘dowry death’ are proved beyond reasonable doubt by ordinary rule of evidence, which means that to prove the essential ingredients of an offence of ‘dowry death’ the burden is on the prosecution. [Paras 12,13]

Keywords: Dowry death · Presumption as to dowry death · Death otherwise than under normal circumstances · Within seven years of marriage · Demand for dowry · Unnatural death · Admissibility of evidence · Acceptability/reliability of evidence · Proved beyond reasonable doubt · Suicide · Harassment/cruelty · Necessary ingredients of dowry death · Presumption u/s.113-B of the Evidence Act · Ingredients to constitute ‘dowry death’ punishable u/s.304-B · Presumption as to dowry death · Ordinary rule of evidence

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Nidhi Jain. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Judgment Manoj Misra, J. 1. This appeal is against the judgment and order of the High Court1 dated 26.04.2012, whereby, while affirming the conviction of the appellants under Sections 304-B and 498-A IPC,2 the appeal3 of the appellants was partly allowed thereby reducing the sentence awarded by the Trial Court4 from 10 years to 7 years R.I. under Section 304-B IPC and maintaining the sentence of 1 year R.I. under Section 498-A IPC. FACTUAL MATRIX 2. The appellants are father-in-law and mother-in-law, respectively, of the deceased (Neelam), who was daughter of Shanker Singh (PW-1) and Saroji
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →