LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/shaurya-sunil-kumar-singh-vs-central-bureau-of-investigation-20260701/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal · Reportable judgment

Shaurya Sunil Kumar Singh vs Central Bureau of Investigation

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
1 July 2026
Case No.
Criminal Appeal No. 3094 of 2026
Result
Dismissed
Bench
N Kotiswar Singh, Sanjay Karol
Citation
[2026] 7 S.C.R. 538 : 2026 INSC 666
Acts & Sections
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 CrPC Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Information Technology Act, 2000
Supreme Court Reports [2026] 7 S.C.R. 538 : 2026 INSC 666
Issue for consideration
Whether the filing of charge-sheet without additional copies as required by s.193(8) of the BNSS would entitle the appellant for the benefit of default bail.
Headnote

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 – ss.187(3), 193(8) – Default Bail – Non-filing of charge-sheet without additional copies, does not entitle the accused for the benefit of default bail – FIR u/s.61(2) r/w ss.318, 336 and 340, BNS, 2023; s.7, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and s.66, IT Act, 2000 for cyber fraud of Rs.3.81 crores – Appellant-accused sought default bail u/s.187(3), BNSS contending that non-filing and non-supply of the chargesheet to him within the statutory period made him eligible for default bail – Application dismissed by Special Judge, CBI – Appellant filed revision application, dismissed by High Court – Correctness: Held: Courts below rightly held that the non-filing of a copy of the charge-sheet cannot become a ground for default bail – Non-filing of additional copies of the charge-sheet u/s.193(8) would not vitiate the charge-sheet/police report itself – As was the case under the erstwhile CrPC, the position under BNSS is to remain that the right to default bail arises when the charge-sheet is not filed within a period of sixty or ninety days, as applicable – Once the charge-sheet is filed, in compliance with the form prescribed u/s.193(3) BNSS, within the aforesaid period, the right to default bail ceases – Non-compliance with s.193(8), BNSS cannot be construed to give the same result as s.187(3) of the BNSS – Appellant not entitled to default bail – Charge-sheet/police report was filed within the prescribed statutory time before the magistrate on 02.09.2025 – The contents thereof, being in compliance with s.193(3) BNSS – Consequently, on 02.09.2025, the right to default bail became extinguished and the appellant ought to have applied for regular bail – Moreover, cognizance was also taken on the charge-sheet filed – This order has not been challenged to date, implying that the contents of the charge-sheet are in accordance with law – Impugned order, affirmed. [Paras 23, 26, 27, 29] Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 – ss.187(3), 193(8),

230 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – ss.167, 173, 207 – Default Bail – Principles governing, enumerated – Constitution of India – Art.21. [Para 20]

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 – ss.187(3), 193(8),

230 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – ss.167, 173, 207 – Default Bail:

Read the full headnote (1 more paragraph)

Held: The section(s) governing default bail, i.e., s.167(2) of the CrPC and s.187(3) of the BNSS are substantially identical – They only differ in phraseology; however, the import thereof remains the same – When it comes to filing a police report, u/s.173 of the CrPC and s.193, of the BNSS, the form thereof remains substantially same – An addition is s.193(8) of the BNSS, whereby the investigating officer is required to file additional copies of the report, for supply to the accused – For supply of the police report and other documents to the accused, a timeline has been instituted of fourteen days from the date of production or appearance of the accused u/s.230 of the BNSS. [Para 19]

Keywords: Default bail · Not entitled to default bail · Default bail rejected · Not providing copy of charge-sheet not a ground for grant of default bail · Non-filing of copy of charge-sheet not a ground for default bail · Non-filing of additional copies of charge-sheet does not vitiate chargesheet/police report · Non-supply of charge-sheet within statutory period · Right to default bail · Section 187(3), BNSS · Section 193(8) of BNSS · Cyber fraud · Mule company · Transfer of proceeds of cybercrime · Digital arrest

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Divya Pandey. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Judgment Sanjay Karol, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The present appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment and order dated 06.02.2026 in CRA No. 475 of 2025 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, whereby the plea of the appellant - accused for default bail came to be dismissed in connection with FIR No. RC0682025E00041 dated 04.07.2025 registered under Sections 61(2) read with 318, 336 and 340 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 20232; Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Section 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. 3. The subject FIR came to be reg
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →