LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/sanjay-colaro-vs-state-of-karnataka-20250421/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal · Reportable judgment

Sanjay Colaro vs State of Karnataka

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
21 April 2025
Case No.
Criminal Appeal No. 2133 of 2025
Result
Disposed
Bench
Vikram Nath, K.V. Viswanathan
Citation
[2025] 4 S.C.R. 2558 : 2025 INSC 686
Acts & Sections
Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 IPC CrPC
Supreme Court Reports [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2558 : 2025 INSC 686
Issue for consideration
Matter pertains to the extension of benefit under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 to the appellant for causing a road accident, resulting in the death of the pedestrian.
Headnote

Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 – Benefit under – Death by rash driving on a public way – Rash and negligent driving by the appellant resulting in the death of the pedestrian – Trial court convicted the appellant u/ss.279 and 304A with six months imprisonment and fine – High Court upheld the conviction and sentence awarded to the appellant – Interference with:

Held: Not called for – However, with regard to the sentence imposed, benefit under the Probation of Offenders Act extended – Sentence by which appellant was directed to undergo simple imprisonment for six months set aside – Compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- awarded in favour of the surviving legal heirs of the deceased in lieu of the benefit extended to the appellant – Penal Code, 1860 – ss.279, 304A. [Paras 11-13]

Keywords: Driving in rash and negligent manner · Road accident · Compensation in lieu of benefit extended to accused · District Legal Services Authority · Underprivileged sections of society · Agricultural workers · Daily-wage labourers

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Nidhi Jain DLSA. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Order 1. Leave granted. 2. The instant appeal has been preferred by the accused-appellant against the final judgment dated 21.11.2022 passed by the High Court of Karnataka in Criminal Revision Petition No. 323 of 2013 wherein the High Court has dismissed the revision petition preferred by the appellant herein and upheld the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 21.11.2011 passed by the Principal Civil Judge & JMFC, Ramanagara1 in CC No. 431 of 2008 under Section 279 and 304A of Indian Penal Code, 1860.2 3. Briefly put, the case of the prosecution is that on 29.03.2008, at about 11 a.m.
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →