LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/sahil-abdulsattar-mansuri-ors-vs-safimahamad-fafirbhai-mansuri-ors-20260604/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal · Reportable judgment

Sahil Abdulsattar Mansuri & Ors. vs Safimahamad Fafirbhai Mansuri & Ors.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
4 June 2026
Case No.
Criminal Appeal No. 3058 of 2026
Bench
Sanjay Karol, Augustine George Masih
Citation
[2026] 7 S.C.R. 67 : 2026 INSC 626
Acts & Sections
IPC Constitution
Supreme Court Reports [2026] 7 S.C.R. 67 : 2026 INSC 626
Issue for consideration
Matter pertains to inordinate delay of nearly two decades in the investigation of the criminal complaint.
Headnote

Constitution of India – Arts.136, 226, 14 – Inordinate delay in the investigation of the criminal complaint – Complaint by the father of the appellants-original complainant, in the year 2007, before the Judicial Magistrate against respondents 1 to 4 u/ss.120B, 406, 420, 463, 468, 471, and 114 IPC alleging that while he was away on Haj pilgrimage, the accused persons forged his signatures and prepared bogus partition deed and fake sale deed, mutated their names in the Revenue Records – Applications by the original complainant seeking directions to the investigating officer to file chargesheet – Thereafter, writ petition praying for a direction to respondent no. 6 to file charge-sheet in their criminal complaint – High Court refused to issue any such direction – Correctness:

Read the full headnote (1 more paragraph)

Held: High Court ought to have taken note of the inordinate delay of nearly two decades in filing of the chargesheet and intervened in the matter – However, matter of serious concern is that despite the lapse of such an inordinate period of time the investigation is yet to reach any meaningful conclusion – It is incumbent upon constitutional courts to not remain mute spectators, when such prolonged investigations are brought to its notice – Thus, in such peculiar circumstances, the High Court ought to have exercised its extraordinary jurisdiction to intervene – State submitted that detailed report, along with original case papers, during transit to the Magistrate, were misplaced and was never received by the Magistrate, and thereafter, re-investigation was ordered by the High Court – During re-investigation, original case papers remained untraceable – Disciplinary proceedings were initiated against the officer concerned and appropriate action was taken – Stand of the State is that in the absence of the original case records and inability to conclusively trace all relevant witnesses, the investigation could not be carried out to its logical conclusion – Upon consideration of the stand of the State, it is found that from the order of the High Court ordering re-investigation, nearly a decade has passed – Even in the case that during the investigation the police were not able to trace the relevant witnesses, ordinarily an appropriate report seeking closure should have been filed before the Magistrate – No reason, as to why the complaint and investigation have remained pending till date – Moreover, incidents wherein case records are lost during an active investigation, have to be taken with utmost seriousness – Such incidents strike at the very core of the criminal justice system, rendering bonafide complaints inactionable – Thus, in the interest of justice, the State of Gujarat and Police Station to conclude investigation within the stipulated period and file an appropriate report with the Magistrate containing all investigative material and if so, the lack thereof. [Paras10-18]

Keywords: Inordinate delay of two decades in the investigation of the criminal complaint · Haj pilgrimage · Forging of signatures · Preparation of bogus partition deed and fake sale deed · Directions to the investigating officer to file chargesheet

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Nidhi Jain. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Order Sanjay Karol, J. Leave granted. 2. Justice delayed is justice denied. While this proverb has been reiterated by Courts for time immemorial, the case at hand is an unfortunate occasion where despite repeatedly knocking the doors of the Courts below, there has been an inordinate delay of nearly two decades in the investigation of the criminal complaint, which compels interference by this Court. 3. The present appeal arises from the impugned order dated 26.06.2025 in Special Criminal Application (Direction) No. 2029 of 2024 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad, whereby the w
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →