LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/ravinder-singh-sidhu-vs-the-state-of-punjab-ors-20250519/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal · Reportable judgment

Ravinder Singh Sidhu vs The State of Punjab & Ors.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
19 May 2025
Case No.
Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 394 of 2024
Result
Allowed
Bench
Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai, K.V. Viswanathan
Citation
[2025] 5 S.C.R. 2648 : 2025 INSC 727
Acts & Sections
IPC CrPC Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes… Gujarat Police Act, 1951 Haryana Protection of Interest of… Madhya Pradesh Nikshepakon Ke Hiton Ka…
Supreme Court Reports [2025] 5 S.C.R. 2648 : 2025 INSC 727
Issue for consideration
Whether multiple FIRs registered across different States can be clubbed and consolidated in one jurisdiction, or at least within one district per State, under the Court’s power u/Arts.32 and 142 of the Constitution.
Headnote

Constitution of India – Arts.32, 142 – Clubbing and consolidation of FIRs – Multiplicity of proceedings – Petition u/Art.32 for clubbing and transfer of FIRs in different States – Petitioner facing 64 FIRs in 10 States – Similar allegations arising out of a common scheme – Writ petition seeking clubbing FIRs within the respective States:

Held: Multiplicity of proceedings not in public interest – Since many States have invoked local Acts, particularly the Act dealing with the Protection of Interest of Depositors, transferring them out of the State also will not serve the ends of justice – Correct course of action would be to merge the FIRs with the earliest FIR in the State concerned – If the first FIR in the respective States registered in respect of offence under the general law and not the special enactment, but if the subsequent FIRs now clubbed are registered in connection with the special law or registered also in connection with the special law, the same after clubbing must be tried under the special law by the Special Courts – While the first FIR will be treated as the First Information Report the subsequent FIRs in each State shall be treated as statements u/s.161 CrPC – Investigating Officer in the criminal case arising out of the principal FIR in the concerned State will be free to file supplementary chargesheets after the collation of all records concerning other FIRs in the concerned State which are clubbed in terms of this order – If Police Report u/s.173 CrPC stands already filed in the clubbed FIRs and the concerned Courts have taken cognizance thereof, said FIRs and criminal cases would also stand transferred and merged/clubbed along with the principal FIR to be proceeded with in accordance with law – Supplementary charge-sheets can be filed – Bail in principal FIR to apply to others unless distinct charges require fresh consideration – Only one FIR each in Chhattisgarh and Delhi, hence, not subject to clubbing – Order in exercise of powers u/Art.32 read with Art.142 passed. [Paras 10, 19-22]

Keywords: Clubbed FIRs · Multiplicity of proceedings · Jurisdictional consolidation · Public interest · Criminal trial · Bail · Merging of FIRs · Principal FIR · General law · Special law · Multiple FIRs

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Aishani Narain, Hony. Associate Editor (Verified by: Nidhi Jain, Editor). Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Judgment K.V. Viswanathan, J. 1. The present Writ Petition has been filed seeking to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction for clubbing and transferring the multiple First Information Reports (FIRs) registered against the petitioner in different States to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Panchkula, Haryana. Though this is the prayer made in the petition, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner states that he would only press for consolidation of the multiple FIRs in each of the States to one district within the respective States. It should also be noticed that as far as the o
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →