LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/ranjeet-mittal-vs-the-state-of-madhya-pradesh-anr-etc-etc-20240903/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal · Reportable judgment

Ranjeet Mittal vs The State of Madhya Pradesh & Anr. Etc. Etc.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
3 September 2024
Case No.
Criminal Appeal No(s). 3680-3682 of 2024
Result
Allowed
Bench
Vikram Nath, Prasanna Bhalachandra Varale
Citation
[2024] 9 S.C.R. 811 : 2024 INSC 766
Acts & Sections
CrPC IPC
Supreme Court Reports [2024] 9 S.C.R. 811 : 2024 INSC 766
Issue for consideration
High Court whether justified in quashing the charges against Respondent Nos.2-5 (husband and in-laws of the victim-deceased) holding that prima facie the respondents did not abet the deceased to commit suicide.
Headnote

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.482 – Penal Code, 1860 – ss.498-A, 306, 34, 302, 201 – Victim died after allegedly falling off from terrace – Trial court framed charges against Respondent Nos.2-5 for abetment to commit suicide – Charges if rightly quashed by High Court:

Held: No – High Court erred in quashing the order of trial court framing charges – Deceased was being abused and ill-treated in her matrimonial home – There was a serious argument between her and her husband right before she allegedly fell off from terrace – The husband took her to hospital on a handcart (thela) despite having alternate options of using the Car – No ornaments were found on her body – For quashing of criminal charges it must be shown that there is no sufficient evidence to prove a prima facie case against the accused persons – However, in the present case, considering the statements by witnesses indicating abuse and torture of deceased by her in-laws and other factual circumstances, prima facie case is made against the accused persons – Given the statements of witnesses, suspicious circumstances around death of deceased and gravity of offense, the trial needs to be conducted to reach to the truth – Orders passed by High Court, set aside – Trial to proceed from the stage of framing of charges. [Paras 18, 19, 21, 22]

Keywords: Abetment to commit suicide · Quashing of charges · Abuse, Ill-treatment, Torture of deceased by in-laws · Fallen off from terrace · Suspicious circumstances · Gravity of offense · Deceased abused · Matrimonial home · Handcart (thela)

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Divya Pandey. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Order 1. Leave granted. 2. The appellant assails the common order dated 08.05.2023 passed by High Court for Judicature of Madhya Pradesh at Gwalior in Criminal Revision No.5766 of 2019, Criminal Revision No. 5767 of 2019 and Criminal Revision 5768 of 2019 whereby the High Court allowed Criminal Revision filed by Respondent no. 2 to 5 and quashed the order dated 07.11.2019 passed by 3rd Additional Session Judge, District- Vidisha against Respondent No. 2 framing charges under section 498-A, 306 read with Section 34 IPC and in alternate under Section 302 read with Section 34, and 201 of Indian
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →