LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/rajesh-monga-vs-housing-development-finance-corporation-limited-ors-20240304/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Rajesh Monga vs Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited & Ors.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
4 March 2024
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 1495 of 2023
Result
Dismissed
Bench
A.S. Bopanna, M.M. Sundresh
Citation
[2024] 3 S.C.R. 1 : 2024 INSC 162
Acts & Sections
Consumer Protection Act, 1986
Supreme Court Reports [2024] 3 S.C.R. 1 : 2024 INSC 162
Issue for consideration
Whether an adjustable rate of interest on home loan would apply based only on the rate of interest being fixed/altered by RBI or the rate of interest fixed/ altered by respondent No.1-Bank.
Headnote

Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – Rate of interest to be charged on home loan – Home buyer filed loan application, opting an adjustable rate of interest – Manager of the Bank assured that the rate of interest would be charged based on the Prime Lending Rate of RBI – Loan amount disbursed, and thereafter, the rate of interest was revised from 7.25% pa to 8.25% pa despite RBI not having changed the Prime Lending Rate and was further increased to 10.5% pa though no change made by RBI – Consumer complaint – National Consumer held that home buyer was bound by the terms and conditions of the agreement while the bank was bound by various instructions of RBI at the time of signing the agreement – Interference with:

Held: Respondent No.1 being a NBFC and as a corporate body would be bound by its policies and procedures with regard to lending and recovery – Applicability of the rate of interest to be charged is a policy matter and cannot be case-specific unless the individual agreement entered into between the parties indicate otherwise – When the parties have signed the agreement, the terms agreed therein would bind the parties and the email exchanged between the parties cannot override the policy decisions of the institution – Having executed the agreement; having agreed to the terms and conditions; having received the loan amount, the appellant-home buyer cannot raise any objection for the first time when the rate of interest was increased after having acquiesced by signing the agreement – Further, the appellant having repaid the loan amount with interest as per the terms of agreement cannot make out a grievance in hindsight and seek refund of the amount paid – In view thereof, no error has been committed so as to call for interference. [Para 10 – 16]

Keywords: Adjustable rate of interest · Home loan · Rate of interest being fixed/altered by RBI · Prime Lending Rate of RBI · Policies and procedures with regard to lending and recovery · Agreement · Acquiesced · Unfair trade practice · Policy decisions · Compensation · Financial institution

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Judgment A.S. Bopanna, J. 1. The appellant is before this Court in this appeal claiming to be aggrieved by the order dated 10.11.2022 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi (‘NCDRC’ for short) in Consumer Complaint No. 2367 of 2018. By the said order the NCDRC has concluded that the appellant is bound by the terms and conditions of the agreement dated 11.01.2006, while the respondent was bound by various instructions of the Reserve Bank of India (‘RBI’ for short), at the time of signing the agreement dated 11.01.2006. Hence the complaint filed by the appella
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →