LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/puni-devi-ors-vs-tulsi-ram-20190213/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal · Reportable judgment

Puni Devi & Ors. vs Tulsi Ram

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
13 February 2019
Case No.
Criminal Appeal No. 263 of 2019
Result
Allowed
Bench
D.Y. Chandrachud, Hemant Gupta
Citation
[2019] 4 S.C.R. 1 : 2019 INSC 193
Supreme Court Reports [2019] 4 S.C.R. 1 : 2019 INSC 193
Headnote

Penal Code, 1860 – s.379, 427, 447 and 504 r/w s.149 – Criminal trespass and theft – Complainant-respondent alleged that accused persons trespassed into his land, thereafter, they cut and removed the wheat crop from the land and ran away with a bundle of wheat – Trial Court after appreciating evidence on the record came to conclusion that the offence was not established – However, High Court set aside the judgment of the Trial Court – On appeal, held: The evidence indicated that there was a dispute in regard to the land since both the parties were claiming possession and a suit regarding the same was pending between them – On this evidence, Trial Court concluded that there was no cogent evidence to indicate the possession of the complainant over the land – Hence, the entire case of the unlawful cutting of the crop of wheat was rendered doubtful – Trial court had carefully appreciated evidence on the record – High Court was not justified in setting aside the findings of the Trial Court.

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The Order of the Court was passed by DR. DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. None appears for the complainant-respondent despite service of notice. 3. This appeal arises from a judgment dated 20 November 2008 of a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh by which a judgment of acquittal has been reversed. The appellants were tried for offences punishable under Sections 379, 427, 447, 504 and 506 read with Section 149 of the Penal Code. 4. The trial before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mandi arose out of a private complaint1. The case of the complainant (th
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →