LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/priyanka-mishra-ors-vs-the-state-of-madhya-pradesh-anr-20230508/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal · Reportable judgment

Priyanka Mishra & Ors. vs The State of Madhya Pradesh & Anr.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
8 May 2023
Case No.
Criminal Appeal No.1545 of 2023
Result
Allowed
Bench
Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Ahsanuddin Amanullah
Citation
[2023] 5 S.C.R. 1152 : 2023 INSC 729
Supreme Court Reports [2023] 5 S.C.R. 1152 : 2023 INSC 729
Headnote

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.482 – Quashing of FIR – Complaint filed by Respondent no.2-wife against appellants (sister-in-law, mother-in-law and father-in-law) and her husband for offences punishable u/s.498-A and s.34, IPC and s.4, Dowry Prohibition Act – Petition filed by appellants u/s.482 for quashing, dismissed – On appeal, held: FIR in question as far as appellants are concerned, is an abuse of the process of the Court – Respondent No.2 resided for less than three weeks in the matrimonial home from the date the marriage was solemnised – She then lived with her husband at Hyderabad for some time and, finally moved to London and then Sweden – Subsequently, upon returning to India, she filed the criminal case in question – While living with her husband in Sweden, respondent no. 2 had filed a divorce petition, hence, there was no occasion per se for her after coming from Sweden to visit the matrimonial home, much less reside there – Moreover, the husband of Respondent No.2 having emailed a complaint to the Superintendent of Police, 3 days prior to the wife lodging her complaint, with regard to threat received from Respondent No.2 to implicate him and his family members, is clearly indicative that the charges, against the appellants were an afterthought – Impugned judgment set aside – FIR quashed qua the appellants – Penal Code, 1860 – ss.498-A, 34 – Dowry Prohibition Act – s.4.

Kahkashan Kausar alias Sonam v State of Bihar (2022)

6 SCC 599 – relied on.

Rajesh Sharma v State of Uttar Pradesh (2018) 10 SCC

472 : [2017] 9 SCR 529; State of Haryana v Bhajan Lal 1992 Suppl. (1) SCC 335 : [1990] 3 Suppl. SCR 259; Pawan Kumar v State of Haryana (1998) 3 SCC

309 : [1998] 1 SCR 746; Mahendra K C v State of Karnataka (2022) 2 SCC 129; Central Bureau of Investigation v A Ravishankar Prasad (2009) 6 SCC

351 : [2009] 9 SCR 1025; S Mahaboob Basha v State of Karnataka (2014) 10 SCC 244 : [2014] 13 SCR 1266; Rupali Devi v State of Uttar Pradesh (2019) 5 SCC 384 : [2019] 6 SCR 577 – referred to.

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The following Order of the Court was passed by AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Leave granted. 3. The present Appeal is directed against the Final Judgment and Order dated 30.04.2019 (hereinafter referred to as the “Impugned Judgment”) passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Gwalior (hereinafter referred to as the “High Court”) in Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 6054 of 2019 by which the petition filed by the appellants under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the “Code”) praying to quash First Info
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →