LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/new-delhi-municipal-council-and-another-vs-manju-tomar-and-others-20240828/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

New Delhi Municipal Council and Another vs Manju Tomar and Others

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
28 August 2024
Case No.
Civil Appeal No(s). 7440-7441 of 2012
Bench
Hima Kohli, Sandeep Mehta
Citation
[2024] 8 S.C.R. 650 : 2024 INSC 635
Acts & Sections
Delhi School Education Act, 1973 Delhi School Education Rules, 1973
Supreme Court Reports [2024] 8 S.C.R. 650 : 2024 INSC 635
Issue for consideration
Matter as regards, the Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Management Committee-DSGMC, challenging the order passed by the High Court, whereby the NDMC was directed to reimburse the pay and perquisites including the pension and other benefits accruing to the staff of the school and then to recover the same from DSGMC.
Headnote

Delhi School Education Rules, 1973 – rr. 46, 47 – Closing down of a school or any class in a school – Absorption of surplus [employee] – School being run by Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Management Committee-DSGMC receiving 95% grant from NDMC, and remaining 5% contribution made by the DSGMC towards the budget of the school, closed down without due approval of Director, NDMC – Issue as regards, reemployment and payment of salaries of the surplus teachers and non-teaching staff upon closure of the school – Order passed by the High Court, whereby the NDMC directed to reimburse the pay and perquisites including the pension and other benefits accruing to the staff of the school and then to recover the same from DSGMC – Challenge to: Held: r.47 cannot be invoked by DSGMC so as to claim that the burden of re-employment and payment of salaries of the surplus teachers and the non-teaching staff upon closure of the school would be that of the NDMC – Absorption only arises when the closure of the school is done in accordance with law, which requires a full justification and prior approval of the Director as per r.46 – Since the closure of the school was undertaken de hors r.46, the submission that the onus to absorb the surplus teaching and non-teaching staff would be that of the NDMC, has no legal sanction and cannot be sustained – Bar of limitation would not come in the way of the NDMC in seeking reimbursement of the amounts paid to the staff of the school from the DSGMC – Principal amount having already been paid by NDMC, the direction given by the High Court for payment of interest to the staff of the school, in terms of the impugned judgment does not call for interference – NDMC to pay all remaining dues including interest to the staff of the school, within the stipulated period – NDMC entitled to seek reimbursement of the amounts paid to staff of the school from the DSGMC, in case the DSGMC voluntarily fails to reimburse the said amount. [Paras 18, 19, 21-26]

Keywords: Closure of the school · Re-employment · Payment of salaries of surplus teachers and non-teaching staff · Unaided minority school · Absorption · Legal sanction · Reimbursement · Arrears of the salary/pension · Retiral benefits · Payment of principal amount · Limitation · Payment of interest

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Nidhi Jain. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Judgment Mehta, J. 1. Heard. 2. These appeals filed by New Delhi Municipal Council1 (hereinafter being referred to as ‘NDMC’) and Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Management Committee2 (hereinafter being referred to as ‘DSGMC’) arise out of a common judgment dated 9th December, 2009 passed by the High Court of Delhi in Letters Patent Appeal Nos. 441 and 442 of 2009 and hence, they have been heard and are being decided together. Civil Appeal Nos. 7442-7444 of 2012 3. Facts in a nutshell relevant and essential for disposal of the appeals are noted hereinbelow. 4. The appellant-DSGMC was managing and ope
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →