LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/narcotic-control-bureau-vs-lakhwinder-singh-20250129/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal · Reportable judgment

Narcotic Control Bureau vs Lakhwinder Singh

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
29 January 2025
Case No.
Criminal Appeal No. 475 of 2025
Result
Dismissed
Bench
Abhay S. Oka, Ujjal Bhuyan
Citation
[2025] 1 S.C.R. 1581 : 2025 INSC 190
Acts & Sections
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances… Constitution
Supreme Court Reports [2025] 1 S.C.R. 1581 : 2025 INSC 190
Issue for consideration
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court granting relief of suspension of sentence and bail to the respondent/accused pending an appeal against his conviction, under the 1985 Act.
Headnote

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 – s.37 – Constitution of India – Art.21 – Suspension of sentence and bail, pending appeal against conviction – Power of courts – Conviction of the respondent for offence punishable under the 1985 Act and sentenced to 10 years of rigorous imprisonment – Since the respondent had undergone incarceration for a period of 4 ½ years out of the fixed term sentence of 10 years, and as the appeal was not likely to be heard before the completion of the sentence, the High Court granted relief of suspension of sentence and bail to the respondent – Interference with: Held: Not called for – If a case is made out for the grant of suspension of sentence and/or bail in deserving cases on merits, the Court is not powerless to grant relief of suspension of sentence and bail pending an appeal, even if an accused has not undergone half of the sentence – There cannot be a rule of thumb that a convict cannot be released on bail pending an appeal against conviction unless he has undergone half of substantive sentence – In the case of fixed-term sentences, if the Courts start adopting a rigid approach, in a large number of cases, till the appeal reaches the stage of the final hearing, the accused would undergo the entire sentence – This would be a violation of the rights of the accused u/Art.21 and would defeat the right of appeal – Furthermore, the Appellate Court is bound by constraints of s.37 while considering the prayer for the grant of bail during the pendency of an appeal – However, if an accused has undergone a substantial part of the substantive sentence and, considering the pendency of criminal appeals, his appeal is not likely to be heard before the accused undergoes the entire sentence, the appellate court can exercise the power of releasing the accused on bail pending the appeal. [Paras 5-8]

Keywords: Suspension of sentence · Suspension of sentence pending appeal · Violation of Article 21 · Bail · Fixed-term sentences · Substantial part of substantive sentence · Appeal not likely to be heard before accused undergoes entire sentence

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Nidhi Jain (2000) 8 SCC 437. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Judgment Abhay S. Oka, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Heard Shri S.V. Raju, learned ASG appearing for the appellant. 3. By the impugned order, the High Court has granted relief of suspension of sentence and bail to the respondent/accused pending an appeal against the conviction. The respondent was convicted for an offence punishable under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short, “the NDPS Act”). The substantive sentence of the respondent is 10 years of rigorous imprisonment. In the appeal of the year 2021, the High Court noted that the respondent had undergone incarcer
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →