LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/muppidi-lakshmi-narayana-reddy-ors-vs-the-state-of-andhra-pradesh-anr-20250423/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal · Reportable judgment

Muppidi Lakshmi Narayana Reddy & Ors. vs The State of Andhra Pradesh & Anr.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
23 April 2025
Case No.
Criminal Appeal No. 2137 of 2025
Result
Allowed
Bench
Ahsanuddin Amanullah, Prashant Kumar Mishra
Citation
[2025] 4 S.C.R. 1715 : 2025 INSC 562
Acts & Sections
IPC Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 Information Technology Act, 2002
Supreme Court Reports [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1715 : 2025 INSC 562
Issue for consideration
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order passed by the High Court dismissing the petition of the appellants u/s.482 CrPC seeking quashing of the proceedings against them.
Headnote

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.482 – Quashing of criminal proceedings – Matrimonial disputes between the parties – In view of the compromise between them, the husband withdrew the case of restitution of conjugal rights and the de-facto complainant-wife withdrew her complaint before the police – Thereafter, the wife left for USA without intimating the husband and the dispute continued – Husband filed petition for dissolution of marriage and as a counterblast wife again lodged police complaint against accused including appellants-sister-in-law of the complainant, her husband and her father-in-law – Petition seeking quashing of proceedings by the appellants – Dismissed by the High Court – Correctness: Held: There are omnibus and general allegations against the appellants that they too used to demand dowry or instigate accused in demanding dowry – Appellants reside at Hyderabad whereas complainant stayed at her marital house at Guntur at the relevant point of time and presently she is staying in USA – There is no specific date as to when the appellants visited Guntur and joined the accused in demanding dowry – Criminal case against the appellants quashed. [Paras 8, 9, 11, 12]

Keywords: Dowry demand · Restitution of conjugal rights · Dissolution of marriage · Leaving the company of husband · Practice of involving relatives of husband in dowry matters · Omnibus and general allegations · Quashing of the proceedings · Compromise

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Nidhi Jain. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Judgment Prashant Kumar Mishra, J. Leave granted. 2. In the present appeal the appellants have challenged the order passed by the High Court whereby their petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for quashing proceedings in C.C. No. 359 of 2016 on the file of the Special Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class for Prohibition & Excise Cases, Guntur was dismissed. 3. The appellant No.1 (A4) is the sister-in-law of the de-facto complainant, appellant No. 2 (A5) is the husband of A4 and appellant No. 3 (A6) is the father-in-law of appellant No. 1 (A4). 4. The marriage between de-facto complainant (responden
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →