LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/munusamy-vs-the-land-acquisition-officer-20210929/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Munusamy vs The Land Acquisition Officer

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
29 September 2021
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 398 of 2010
Result
Partly allowed
Bench
M.R. Shah, A.S. Bopanna
Citation
[2021] 9 S.C.R. 1 : 2021 INSC 572
Supreme Court Reports [2021] 9 S.C.R. 1 : 2021 INSC 572
Headnote

Land Acquisition Act, 1894: Comparable sale – Land admeasuring 1.80 acres situated in village Anniyalam, Denkanikottai Taluk, District Dharamapuri, Tamil Nadu was proposed for acquisition – s.4 Notification was published on 27.09.1990/11.01.1991 – s.6 declaration was published on 12.12.1991 – Collector assessed compensation of said land at Rs.16000/- per acre – Reference court assessed market value at Rs. 2183.33 per cent relying upon the document/sale deed dated 11.01.1990 executed by the land owner himself by which the land suitable for construction of the houses and situated very close to the village Anniyalam was sold at Rs. 2977 per cent – High Court partly allowed the appeal and assessed compensation at Rs. 232.45 per cent – Aggrieved, original owner/claimant filed instant appeal – Whether the land owners are entitled to the enhanced amount of compensation relying upon the document dated 11.01.1990 executed by the land owner himself by which the land admeasuring 5 ½ cent was sold for Rs.2977 per cent – Held: It is true that sale deed dated 11.01.1990 cannot be discarded solely on the ground that it was executed by the land owner in favour of his relative as nothing is on record that at the time when sale deed dated 11.01.1990 was executed the parties were aware that the land in question was going to be acquired in the nearby future – In absence of any comparable sale instances one has to consider sale deed dated 11.01.1990 – Even otherwise, sale deed dated 11.01.1990 can be said to be comparable instance having regard to the proximity from time angle as well as proximity from situation angle – However, at the same time one cannot lose sight of the fact that the sale deed dated 11.01.1990 was for the small parcel of the land i.e. 5 ½ cent only – In given case even a sale deed of comparable sales of small areas also can be considered by giving suitable deductions while fixing market value – Therefore, considering the fact that sale deed dated 11.01.1990 was executed for sale consideration of Rs.16,375/- for

Read the full headnote (3 more paragraphs)

5 ½ cent which comes to Rs.2977 per cent and after deducting 60% (in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case) the market value can be determined at Rs.1191 per cent – Appellant-original claimant-land owner shall be entitled compensation for the land acquired at Rs.1191 per cent with all other statutory benefits. Partly allowing the appeal, the Court

HELD: In absence of any comparable sale instances one has to consider the sale deed dated 11.01.1990 Ex.C1. Even otherwise Ex.C1 the sale deed dated 11.01.1990 can be said to be comparable instance having regard to the proximity from time angle as well as proximity from situation angle. Even the land in question acquired for the housing project. However, at the same time one cannot lose sight of the fact that the sale deed dated 11.01.1990 Ex.C1 was for the small parcel of the land i.e. 5 ½ cent only. In given case even a sale deed of comparable sales of small areas also can be considered by giving suitable deductions while fixing market value. Therefore, having regard to the peculiar features, facts and circumstances of the case and interest of justice, date of compensation can be fixed considering the sale deed dated 11.01.1990 Ex.C1 by giving suitable deductions i.e.

60 per cent deduction. Therefore, considering the fact that the sale deed dated 11.01.1990 Ex.C1 was executed for a sale consideration of Rs.16,375/- for 5 ½ cent which will come to Rs.2977 per cent and after deducting 60 per cent (in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case) the market value can be determined/assessed at Rs.1191 per cent. [Para 7.2][5-H; 6-AD]

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by M. R. SHAH, J. 1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 30.07.2008 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in AS No.1222 of 2001 by which the High Court has partly allowed the said appeal and has enhanced the amount of compensation to Rs.232.45 per cent for the land acquired, original land owner – claimant has preferred the present appeal. 1.1 The land admeasuring 0.73.0 hectare (1.80 acres) of land situated in village Anniyalam, Denkanikottai Taluk, District Dharamapuri, Tamil Nadu came to be acquir
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →