LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/mubin-shaikh-vs-the-state-of-maharashtra-anr-20180208/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal · Reportable judgment

Mubin Shaikh vs The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
8 February 2018
Case No.
Criminal Appeal No. 245 of 2018
Result
Disposed
Bench
S.A. Bobde, L. Nageswara Rao
Citation
[2018] 1 S.C.R. 653 : 2018 INSC 121
Supreme Court Reports [2018] 1 S.C.R. 653 : 2018 INSC 121
Headnote

Bail – Prosecution case was that the accused-appellants tarageted the victim-deceased because he belonged to a certain community and assaulted him with bats and sticks which resulted in his death – Trial court rejected their bail applications – High Court directed release of accused on the ground that accused had no personal animus against the deceased and seemed to be provoked in the name of religion – High Court in impugned judgment noted that the fault of the deceased was only that he belonged to another religion and this factor was considered in favour of the accused – Held: Such an observations appeared to be coloured with a bias for or against the community – The directions contained in the impugned order cannot be sustained – Impugned order is set aside – Bail applications are restored to the file of High Court – High Court to hear the matters afresh.

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The following Order of the Court was delivered: ORDER 1. Leave granted. 2. On 02.06.2014 at about 9.00 P.M., the deceased Shaikh Mohsin was proceeding for dinner with another friend Riyaz. He was wearing a pastel green colour shirt and had a beard. According to the prosecution, the accused respondents before us, targeted them because they belonged to a certain community and started assaulting Shaikh Mohsin with hockey sticks, bats and stones. This resulted in his death. Apparently, the accused were said to have been highly motivated to do the act because they had attended a meeting of a bod
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →