LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/mohammed-zakir-vs-shabana-ors-20180723/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal · Reportable judgment

Mohammed Zakir vs Shabana & Ors.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
23 July 2018
Case No.
Criminal Appeal No. 926 of 2018
Result
Disposed
Bench
Kurian Joseph, Sanjay Kishan Kaul
Citation
[2018] 7 S.C.R. 1128 : 2018 INSC 637
Supreme Court Reports [2018] 7 S.C.R. 1128 : 2018 INSC 637
Headnote

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.362 – Recalling of the order – High Court recalled its own order, rendering it patently erroneous – Propriety of – Held: Not proper – The whole purpose of s.362 is only to correct a clerical or arithmetical error – However, High Court sought to re-hear the matter on merits – That is impermissible under law.

Disposing of the appeal, the Court

HELD: The High Court should not have exercised the power under Section 362 Cr.P.C. for a correction on merits. However patently erroneous the earlier order be, it can only be corrected in the process known to law and not under Section 362 Cr.P.C. The whole purpose of Section 362 Cr.P.C. is only to correct a clerical or arithmetical error. What the High Court sought to do in the impugned order is not to correct a clerical or arithmetical error; it sought to re-hear the matter on merits, since, according to the Judge, the earlier order was patently erroneous. That is impermissible under law. [Para 4] [1129-D-E]

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KURIAN, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. We have heard the petitioner, who is appearing in person, Mr. Joseph Aristotle S., learned counsel appearing for Respondent Nos.1 to 4 and Mr. Gopal Sankaranarayanan, learned counsel, who was appointed as an amicus in this matter. 3. The appellant is aggrieved since the High Court passed an order under Section 362 Cr.P.C. dated 28.04.2017 recalling its own order dated 18.04.2017. The order dated 28.04.2017 reads as under:“Notwithstanding section 362 of Cr.P.C. the order rendered by this Court earlier on 18.04.2017 is
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →