LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/mala-choudhary-anr-vs-state-of-telangana-anr-20250718/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal · Reportable judgment

Mala Choudhary & Anr. vs State of Telangana & Anr.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
18 July 2025
Case No.
Criminal Appeal No. 3052 of 2025
Result
Allowed
Bench
Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta
Citation
[2025] 7 S.C.R. 1208 : 2025 INSC 870
Acts & Sections
CrPC IPC Constitution
Supreme Court Reports [2025] 7 S.C.R. 1208 : 2025 INSC 870
Issue for consideration
Issue arose as to correctness of the order passed by the High Court dismissing the petition filed by the appellants, seeking quashing of FIR.
Headnote

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.482 – Quashing of FIR – Complainant alleged non-execution of a registered sale deed in terms of an oral agreement to sell against the appellants – FIR lodged as also suit for specific performance filed – Arrest of the appellants and subsequently released on bail – Appellants filed for quashing of FIR – High Court dismissed the petition without addressing the merits – Correctness:

Held: Complainant misused the process of police investigation so as to entangle the appellants in a totally false and frivolous prosecution – There is a drastic variance in the complainant’s allegations qua the oral agreement as narrated in the FIR vis-a-vis as set out in the plaint – Complainant manipulated and distorted the facts and used its influence for getting the FIR registered against the appellants – On a bare reading of the FIR, it is clear that a plain and simple dispute has been given the cloak of a criminal case by misusing the criminal machinery – Not only this, appellant no.1 being a 70 years’ old lady and wife of retired Army officer was arrested in connection with this false and frivolous FIR and had to remain in the custody for almost eight days – No justification for registering the FIR – In gross disregard to all tenets of law, the impugned FIR came to be registered for allegations which had no elements of any offence whatsoever what to talk of a cognizable offence – High Court acted with absolute pedantic approach, while disposing of the quashing petition filed by the appellants in the cryptic manner, without even touching the merits of the case – Appellants made fair offer to return the amount transferred to them by the complainant through valid banking transactions, however, the complainant refused for the same – Art.136 jurisdiction exercised – Impugned order and FIR quashed and set aside – Police protection to be provided to appellants whenever they go to Hyderabad for management of the properties – Complainant penalized with the exemplary cost for misusing the process of criminal law in a case of purely civil nature – Penal Code, 1860 – ss.406, 420 – Constitution of India – Art.136. [Paras 9-22]

Keywords: Quashing of FIR · Oral agreement to sell · Registration of sale deed · Misuse of police investigation · Manipulated and distorted facts · Used influence to get FIR registered · Cloak of criminal case · Misuse of criminal machinery · False and frivolous FIR · Police protection · Exemplary cost · Case of purely civil nature · Arrest · Kept in custody · Pedantic approach · Cryptic manner

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Nidhi Jain. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Judgment Mehta, J. 1. Heard. 2. Leave granted. 3. The appellants herein have approached this Court by way of the instant appeal, under Article 136 of the Constitution of India, for assailing the final order dated 28th April, 2023 passed by the High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad1 in Criminal Petition No. 7869 of 2021 whereby the High Court dismissed the petition filed by the appellants, seeking quashing of the FIR No. 771 of 2020 registered at Police Station Gachibowli, Cyberabad and the Criminal Case No. 3613 of 2021 registered on the file of XII Addl. Metropolitan Magistrate, Kukatpally
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →