LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/m-venkateswaran-vs-the-state-rep-by-the-inspector-of-police-20250124/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal · Reportable judgment

M. Venkateswaran vs The State rep. by the Inspector of Police

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
24 January 2025
Case No.
Criminal Appeal No. 379 of 2025
Result
Partly allowed
Bench
K.V. Viswanathan, Sarasa Venkatanarayana Bhatti
Citation
[2025] 2 S.C.R. 231 : 2025 INSC 106
Acts & Sections
IPC Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961
Supreme Court Reports [2025] 2 S.C.R. 231 : 2025 INSC 106
Issue for consideration
Matter pertains to the modification of sentence imposed for offence u/s.498A IPC and s.4 of the DP Act and payment of compensation to the wife-de facto complainant.
Headnote

Penal Code, 1860 – s.498A – Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 – s.4 – Dowry demand – Unlawful demand for the gold sovereigns and continued harassment meted out to the girl-wife on failure to meet the said demand – Complaint by the wife against her husband and in-laws alleging offences punishable u/ss.498A, 406, 420, 506(2) IPC and s.4 of the DP Act – Conviction of the husband for offence u/s.498A IPC and s.4 of the DP Act and and sentenced to three years imprisonment and fine for offence u/s.498A, and one year SI for offence u/s.4 of the DP Act – High Court, while confirming the conviction, modified the sentence from three years imprisonment to two years imprisonment u/s.498A and sentence of one year imprisonment for offence u/s.4 of the DP Act – Interference with:

Held: In view of the evidence, interferance with the concurrent conviction u/ss.498A IPC and s.4 of the DP Act, not called for – Ingredients of s.498-A fully satisfied – Husband subjected the wife to harassment with a view to coerce her and her mother to meet the unlawful demand for the gold sovereigns and continued to harass her when the wife and her relatives failed to meet such demand – Ingredients of s.498-A IPC and s.4 DP Act clearly made out – However, the quantum of sentence is interfered with – Sentence imposed is set aside – Husband sentenced to the period already undergone directing him to pay a sum of three lakhs within the stipulated period in the trial court as compensation, to be payable to the wife, since the husband has undergone approximately 3 months in custody, the couple lived together exactly for three days, the de facto complainant-wife is married and settled abroad, the case is pending for nearly 19 years, both the parties have moved on in life, and the husband is willing to render appropriate community service in the field of information and technology. [Paras 12-18]

Keywords: Modification of sentence · Payment of compensation to wife-de facto complainant · Dowry demand · Unlawful demand for gold sovereigns · Continued harassment meted out to girl on failure to meet dowry demand · Three years imprisonment u/s.498A IPC · Two years imprisonment u/s.498A IPC · One year imprisonment for offence u/s.4 of the DP Act · Ingredients of s.498-A IPC · Couple lived together for three days · Case pending for 19 years · Render community service in the field of information and technology

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Nidhi Jain. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Judgment K.V. Viswanathan, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The present appeal calls in question the correctness of the judgment and order dated 21.06.2022 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Criminal R.C. No. 1017 of 2017. By the said judgment, the High Court, while confirming the conviction of the appellant under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC’) and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (for short ‘DP Act), modified the sentence from three years imprisonment to two years imprisonment under Section 498A of IPC. A sentence of one year imprisonment
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →