LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/lal-mohd-anr-vs-state-of-u-p-ors-20250514/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal · Reportable judgment

Lal Mohd. & Anr. vs State of U.P. & Ors.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
14 May 2025
Case No.
Criminal Appeal No. 2593 of 2025
Result
Allowed
Bench
Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta
Citation
[2025] 5 S.C.R. 741 : 2025 INSC 811
Acts & Sections
Uttar Pradesh Gangsters & Anti-Social… IPC Criminal Law Amendment Act, 2013 Prevention of Damage to Public Property… UP Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities… Constitution
Supreme Court Reports [2025] 5 S.C.R. 741 : 2025 INSC 811
Issue for consideration
Whether the prosecution of the appellants under the UP Gangsters Act satisfies the statutory thresholds prescribed under the Act, when it is based entirely on a single FIR, in which the appellants were already arrested and released on bail, and where no new act or omission had occurred between the date of registration of the First FIR i.e., 11.10.2022, and the preparation of the gang chart on 29.04.2023.
Headnote

Uttar Pradesh Gangsters & Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 – s.2(b), (c) – First FIR was registered against the appellants and others on 11.10.2022 for alleged involvement in violence and vandalism following a social media post allegedly hurting their religious sentiments – Gang Chart was prepared on 29.04.2023, impugned FIR u/s.3(1), UP Gangsters Act was filed on 30.04.2023 – Appellants sought quashing thereof, refused by High Court – Interference with:

Held: The procedural and substantive thresholds prescribed u/s.2(b) and 2(c), UP Gangsters Act have not been adequately met in the present case – The incident occurred on 10.10.2022, first FIR was filed on 11.10.2022 and the appellants were granted bail in January, 2023 – No new act or omission occurred between the registration of the foundational FIR on 11.10.2022 and the preparation of the gang chart on 29.04.2023 – Thus, gang chart was prepared on 29.04.2023 and the impugned FIR was filed on 30.04.2023, sans any fresh or intervening conduct – Mere listing of multiple accused persons without demonstrating their organizational roles, command structure, or evidence of prior or continued coordinated criminal activities fails to meet the stringent requirements for establishing gang membership – Thus, mere involvement of the accused appellants in a demonstration pursuant to a communal flare-up, however serious, does not ipso facto transform the participants into a ‘gang’ without evidence of organised and continuous criminal activity – Gang chart was a post-facto construction aimed at recharacterizing an already investigated and prosecuted communal altercation as an act of organised crime, without any new evidence to warrant such a serious escalation – Impugned judgment set aside – Impugned FIR and all consequential proceedings quashed – Quashing. [Paras 17, 19, 20, 29, 30]

Uttar Pradesh Gangsters & Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 – s.2(b), (c) – “Gang” and “gangster” – Determination. [Paras 12-14]

Uttar Pradesh Gangsters & Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 – Constitution of India – Art.21 – Extraordinary legislation with stringent penal provisions – Invocation of – Standard of evidence – Exercise of power by State – Power conferred upon the State not an instrument of harassment or intimidation, particularly where political motivations may be at play. [Paras 23-26]

Keywords: Sections 2(b), (c) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters & Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 · Gang · Gangster · FIR under UP Gangsters Act · Gang chart · Quashing of FIR · Social media post · Incendiary social media post · Religious sentiments hurt · Communal protest · Communal flare-up · Protest against social media post · Language defamatory towards a particular religion · Disparaging comments about a particular religious belief · Vandalism of shop · Gang membership · Violence

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Divya Pandey. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Judgment Mehta, J. 1. Heard. 2. Leave granted. 3. The present appeal by special leave, arises out of the final judgment and order dated 3rd May, 20231, passed by the learned Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad2, in Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 3494 of 2023, whereby the High Court dismissed the Writ Petition filed by the appellants seeking quashing of First Information Report3, in CC No. 132 of 20234 dated 30th April, 2023, under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters & Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 19865, lodged at Police Station Khargupu
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →