LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/k-gopi-vs-the-sub-registrar-ors-20250407/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

K. Gopi vs The Sub-Registrar & Ors.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
7 April 2025
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 3954 of 2025
Result
Allowed
Bench
Abhay S. Oka, Ujjal Bhuyan
Citation
[2025] 5 S.C.R. 47 : 2025 INSC 462
Acts & Sections
Registration Act, 1908 Registration (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Act… Tamil Nadu Registration Rules
Supreme Court Reports [2025] 5 S.C.R. 47 : 2025 INSC 462
Issue for consideration
Matter pertains to the correctness of order by the Division Bench of the High Court with regard to upholding the order of the sub-registrar, refusing registration of a sale deed.
Headnote

Registration Act, 1908 – s.69 – Registration (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Act, 2008 – ss.22-A, 22-B – Registration Rules – r.55A – Vires of r. 55A – Refusal of the Sub-registrar to register the sale deed on the ground that the title of the vendor and the appellant not established – Correctness – Sub-Registrar refused to register sale deed executed in favour of the appellant – On direction by the Sub-Registrar to reconsider, the Sub-Registrar again refused registration – Writ petition thereagainst rejected – Writ appeal challenging the rejection also dismissed – Interference: Held: On plain reading of ss.22-A and 22-B, on the ground of failure to produce documents of title of the vendor, registration could not have been refused – No provision under the 1908 Act confers power on any authority to refuse registration of a transfer document on the ground that the documents regarding the title of the vendor are not produced, or if his title is not established – r.55A provides that unless documents are produced to prove that the executant has a right in respect of the property subject matter of the instrument, the registration of the same shall be refused – Under the scheme of the 1908 Act, it is not the function of the Sub-Registrar or Registering Authority to ascertain whether the vendor has title to the property which he is seeking to transfer – Once the registering authority is satisfied that the parties to the document are present before him and the parties admit execution thereof before him, subject to making procedural compliances, the document must be registered – Rule making power u/s.69 cannot be exercised to make a Rule that is inconsistent with the provisions of the 1908 Act – r.55A(i) is inconsistent with the provisions of the 1908 Act, thus, r.55 declared ultra vires the 1908 Act – Impugned judgment quashed and set aside. [Paras 9,11-17]

Keywords: Sale deed · Registration of sale deed · Title of the vendor · Refusal to register sale deed · Power to make rules under Registration Act · Non-traceable certificate · Adjudicatory power of registering officer

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Nidhi Jain. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Judgment Abhay S. Oka, J. FACTUAL ASPECTS 1. This appeal takes an exception to the impugned judgment dated 20th March, 2024, passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Madras. On 02nd September, 2022, a sale deed was executed by one Jayaraman Mudaliyar in favour of the appellant in respect of the property mentioned therein. The Sub-Registrar refused to register the sale deed. The appellant filed a writ petition to challenge the refusal. However, the writ petition was dismissed. Thereafter, the appellant preferred an appeal to the District Registrar against the Sub-Registr
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →