LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/k-bharthi-devi-and-anr-vs-state-of-telangana-and-anr-20241003/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal · Reportable judgment

K. Bharthi Devi and Anr. vs State of Telangana and Anr.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
3 October 2024
Case No.
Criminal Appeal No. 4113 of 2024
Result
Allowed
Bench
Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai, K.V. Viswanathan
Citation
[2024] 10 S.C.R. 650 : 2024 INSC 750
Acts & Sections
CrPC IPC Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
Supreme Court Reports [2024] 10 S.C.R. 650 : 2024 INSC 750
Issue for consideration
Despite the dispute involved having predominantly overtures of a civil dispute and the matter having been compromised between the parties, whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the quashing petition filed by the accused persons including the appellants seeking quashing of the chargesheet.
Headnote

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.482 – Penal Code, 1860 – s.120-B r/w ss.420, 409, 467, 468, 471 – Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 – s.13(1)(d), 13(2) – Quashing – Of criminal cases having predominantly civil character when parties have settled the dispute – Dispute regarding the loan transaction availed by accused persons-borrowers – Matter settled between the Bank and the accused persons in proceedings before DRT – Accused persons including the appellants sought quashing of the chargesheet filed by CBI before trial Court, rejected by High Court:

Held: Criminal cases having overwhelmingly and predominantly civil character, particularly those arising out of commercial transactions or matrimonial relationship/family disputes should be quashed when the parties have settled the dispute – In the present case, the dispute involved predominantly had overtures of a civil dispute – Further, it is undisputed that upon payment of the amount under the One Time Settlement (OTS), the loan account of the borrower was closed and the matter was compromised/settled between the borrowers and the Bank rendering the possibility of conviction remote and bleak – Present is a fit case wherein the High Court ought to have exercised its jurisdiction u/s.482, CrPC and quash the criminal proceedings – Impugned judgment and the criminal proceedings against the appellants are quashed and set aside. [Paras 11, 31, 34, 35]

Keywords: Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 · Quashing · Criminal Cases Having Predominantly Civil Character · Loan Transaction · Borrowers · Bank · Commercial Transactions · Matrimonial Relationship/Family Disputes · Compromise/Settlement Between The Parties · Criminal Proceedings Quashed · Debts Recovery Tribunal

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Divya Pandey. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Judgment B.R. Gavai, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The present appeal challenges the final judgment and order dated 1st September 2017 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh, whereby the High Court dismissed the Criminal Petition No. 5778 of 2016 filed by the accused persons, including the appellants herein, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (“CrPC.” for short) thereby seeking quashing of the charge-sheet in C.C. No. 16 of 2014 on the file of Principal Special Judge for CBI Cases, Nampally, Hyderabad (
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →