LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/jalaluddin-khan-vs-union-of-india-20240813/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal · Reportable judgment

Jalaluddin Khan vs Union of India

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
13 August 2024
Case No.
Criminal Appeal No. 3173 of 2024
Result
Allowed
Bench
Abhay S. Oka, Augustine George Masih
Citation
[2024] 8 S.C.R. 633 : 2024 INSC 604
Acts & Sections
Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967
Supreme Court Reports [2024] 8 S.C.R. 633 : 2024 INSC 604
Issue for consideration
Factors to be taken into consideration, under Section 43D(5) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, while deciding Bail Applications for offences falling under Chapters IV and VI of the Act.
Headnote

Bail is the Rule and jail is an exception – Principle – Statutes with Stringent condition – Applicability of:

Held: The Court while deciding an application of bail falling under the provisions of Section 43D (5) is not required to conduct a minitrial – Only a prima facie case has to be established – The Court has to examine the material forming a part of the charge sheet to decide whether there are reasonable grounds for believing that the accusations against the person applying for bail are prima facie true – While doing so, the court must take the charge sheet as it is – When a case is made out for a grant of bail, the Courts should not have any hesitation in granting bail – The allegations of the prosecution may be very serious – But, the duty of the Courts is to consider the case for grant of bail in accordance with the law – “Bail is the rule and jail is an exception” is a settled law – Even in cases of statutes where there are stringent conditions for the grant of bail, the same rule holds good with only a modification that the bail can be granted if the conditions in the statute are satisfied – The rule also means that once a case is made out for the grant of bail, the Court cannot decline to grant bail – If the Courts start denying bail in deserving cases, it will be a violation of the rights guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. [Para 15, 21]

Keywords: Bail is the Rule and Jail is the exception · Prima facie · Mini-trial

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Vidhi Thaker, Hony. Associate Editor (Verified by: Mr. Kanu Agrawal, Adv.). Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Judgment Abhay S. Oka, J. FACTUAL ASPECTS 1. The appellant is being prosecuted for the offences punishable under Sections 121, 121A and 122 of the Indian Penal Code (for short, ‘the IPC’) and Sections 13, 18, 18A and 20 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (for short, ‘the UAPA’). A charge sheet was filed on 7th January 2023. He is shown as accused no.2 in the charge sheet. The appellant applied for bail before the Special Court under the UAPA, which was rejected. Hence, the appellant and some coaccused applied for bail before the High Court. By the impugned judgment, the praye
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →