LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/jahir-hak-vs-the-state-of-rajasthan-20220411/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal · Reportable judgment

Jahir Hak vs The State of Rajasthan

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
11 April 2022
Case No.
Criminal Appeal No. 605 of 2022
Result
Allowed
Bench
K.M. Joseph, Hrishikesh Roy
Citation
[2022] 3 S.C.R. 101 : 2022 INSC 412
Supreme Court Reports [2022] 3 S.C.R. 101 : 2022 INSC 412
Headnote

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s.439 – Application for anticipatory bail by undertrial prisoner who has undergone 8 years of incarceration – Appellant was arrested in connection with FIR for offences punishable under ss.10, 13, 15 to 18, 18A, 18B, 19, 20, 23 and 38 of 1967 Act – Charges were framed against him on 29.01.2018 – Appellant has been in custody for a period of 8 years – By impugned order, his application for bail was rejected by High Court – On appeal, held: Appellant is charged with offences, some of which are punishable with a minimum punishment of 10 years and the sentence extending to imprisonment for life – The condition in s.43D(5) of the Act of 1967 has been understood to be less stringent than the provisions contained in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 – Prosecution seeks to examine as many as 109 witnesses of which only 6 witnesses have been fully examined so far – In view of nature of the case against the appellant, the evidence and long period of incarceration that he has already undergone, appellant released on bail subject to such conditions as shall be fixed by the trial court – Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 – ss.10, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 18A, 18B, 19, 20, 23 and 38 Union of India v. K. A. Najeeb (2021) 3 SCC 713 – relied on.

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The following order of the Court was passed: ORDER Leave granted. (1) By the impugned order, the appellant is denied bail which is sought under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The appellant was arrested on 08.05.2014 in connection with FIR 113/2014 of Police Station Pratapnagar, Jodhpur for offences punishable under Sections 10, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 18A, 18B, 19, 20, 23 and 38 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (in short ‘Act of 1967’). (2) A chargesheet came to be filed against the appellant on 17.09.2014. Charges have been framed against the appellant on 29.0
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →