LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/in-re-to-issue-certain-guidelines-regarding-inadequacies-and-deficiencies-in-criminal-trials-vs-the--20210420/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal · Reportable judgment

In Re: to Issue Certain Guidelines Regarding Inadequacies and Deficiencies in Criminal Trials vs The State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
20 April 2021
Case No.
Suo Moto Writ (Crl) No(s). 01 of 2017
Result
Disposed
Bench
S.A. Bobde, L. Nageswara Rao, S. Ravindra Bhat
Citation
[2021] 4 S.C.R. 100 : 2021 INSC 260
Supreme Court Reports [2021] 4 S.C.R. 100 : 2021 INSC 260
Headnote

Criminal trials: Draft Rules for expeditious and fair criminal trials – Implementation of – Suo motu proceeding under Art. 32 – This Court took notice of deficiencies occurring in the course of criminal trials and certain practices adopted by trial courts in criminal proceedings as well as in the disposal of criminal cases, leading to prolonged proceedings – Also that there were inadequacies in the practices and rules of High Courts, and as such desirability of a uniform approach – Issuance notice by this Court to the Registrar Generals of all High Courts, State Governments and Union Territories to file their responses – Responses filed by States/Union Territories and High Courts – Thereafter, Draft Rules of Criminal Practice, 2020 prepared by the stakeholders and said Draft Rules submitted for the consideration of this Court – High Courts again called to file responses to Draft Rules – On perusal of the responses, this Court again found either reservation or divergence in opinion about the practice to be adopted by few High Courts – Subsequently, this Court carried out necessary amendments to the Draft Rules and Draft Rules finalized in terms thereof– In view thereof, issuance of directions to all High Courts to take expeditious steps to incorporate the Draft Rules of Criminal Practice, 2021 as part of the rules governing criminal trials, and ensure that the existing rules, notifications, orders and practice directions are suitably modified, and promulgated within the stipulated period – State Governments, as well as the Union of India to carry out consequential amendments to their police and other manuals, within the stipulated period – Judicial Notice – Constitution of India – Art. 32

Bipin Shantilal Panchal v. State of Gujarat (2001) 3 SCC 1 : [2001] 2 SCR 29 – referred to.

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The following order of the Court was passed: ORDER 1. This suo motu proceeding under Article 32 was initiated during the course of hearing of a criminal appeal1. The Court noticed common deficiencies which occur in the course of criminal trials and certain practices adopted by trial courts in criminal proceedings as well as in the disposal of criminal cases and causes. These related, amongst others, to the manner in which documents (i.e. list of witnesses, list of exhibits, list of material objects) referred to are presented and exhibited in the judgment, and the lack of uniform practices in
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →