LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/gurdev-singh-bhalla-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-20240105/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal · Reportable judgment

Gurdev Singh Bhalla vs State of Punjab & Ors

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
5 January 2024
Case No.
Criminal Appeal No. 120 of 2024
Result
Dismissed
Bench
Vikram Nath, Rajesh Bindal
Citation
[2024] 1 S.C.R. 319 : 2024 INSC 22
Acts & Sections
CrPC IPC Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
Supreme Court Reports [2024] 1 S.C.R. 319 : 2024 INSC 22
Issue for consideration
Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the Revision filed by the appellant against the order of the Special Judge allowing the application u/s. 319 CrPC summoning the appellant along with three other officials of the Police Department.
Headnote

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s. 319 – Power to proceed against other persons appearing to be guilty of offence – Case of misappropriation of paddy against father of the informant – Application u/s. 319 for summoning the appellant-Inspector investigating the crime and three other police officials – Allegation against them that they demanded money – Application allowed by the trial court – Said order upheld by the High Court – Interference with: Held: Statement of the informant providing complete facts with respect to the conduct of the police officials immediately after surrender of his father – Statement consistent throughout the investigation and trial, and with the other witnesses-complainant’s wife and his father giving the same details – Witnesses equivocally narrated the incidents that took place at different places regarding threats, demand of huge sum of money, torture of the father – In view thereof, there appears to be prima facie evidence on record to make it a triable case as against the appellant – Thus, the order passed by the High Court not interfered with. [Paras 8, 14]

Keywords: Summoning of the officials · Misappropriation · Investigation · Trial · Evidence · Witness · Sanction · Torture in custody · Conduct of police officials · Recording of statements · Police remand · Prima facie evidence

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Judgment Vikram Nath, J. Leave granted. 2. The challenge by means of this appeal is to an order dated 23rd March, 2023 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh whereby the Criminal Revision filed by the appellant against the order of the Special Judge, Bathinda dated 05.03.2018 allowing the application under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 19731summoning the appellant along with three other officials of the Police Department has been dismissed. Cr.P.C. 3. Relevant facts are as follows: 3.1 Punjab Agro Foodgrains Corporation Ltd., Bathinda, lodged a comp
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →