LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/gpsk-capital-private-limited-formerly-known-as-mantri-finance-limited-vs-the-securities-and-exchange-20230320/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Gpsk Capital Private Limited (Formerly Known As Mantri Finance Limited) vs The Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
20 March 2023
Case No.
Civil Appeal No(s). 2402 of 2008
Result
Disposed
Bench
Ajay Rastogi, Bela M. Trivedi
Citation
[2023] 2 S.C.R. 737 : 2023 INSC 262
Supreme Court Reports [2023] 2 S.C.R. 737 : 2023 INSC 262
Headnote

Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992: s. 15(Z) – Securities and Exchange Board of India (Stock Brokers and Sub Brokers) Regulations, 1992 – Sch. III, para 4 – Fees continuity benefits under – Entitlement to – Conversion of individual membership into a corporate entity – On facts, a member of Calcutta Stock Exchange-CSE, registered as a stock broker, transferred his membership of CSE in favour of the appellant company which was a member of National Stock Exchange- NSE – Appellant company then became the member of CSE and was registered as stock broker of CSE – Appellant company claimed exemption from the payment of registration fee for the period for which the erstwhile member has already paid the fees and that the conditions prescribed under para 4 of Sch. III to the Regulations were satisfied – Board rejected the claim – In appeal, the tribunal held that the single registration with the Board is sufficient even if the stock broker has multiple memberships and functions from several stock exchanges, thus will have to pay the fee for initial registration with the Board and that the Company failed to satisfy the conditions of clause (4) of Schedule III and was not eligible to claim exemption from payment of fee over the period for which the erstwhile individual paid the fees – On appeal, held: When the erstwhile member transferred his membership card of CSE to the appellant Company, he was not a whole time Director but was only a Director – Date on which he acquired 40% of the shareholding in the appellant Company is unclear – Details provided nowhere indicate the erstwhile member as a whole time Director for any of the relevant years – Thus, the appellant Company failed to fulfil the conditions under Para 4 of Sch. III and not entitled to claim fee continuity benefits. Stock Exchange Members Association and Another

2022 SCC Online SC 1392 – referred to.

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by RASTOGI, J. Civil Appeal No(s). 2402 of 2008 1. The instant appeal has been filed under Section 15(Z) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992(hereinafter being referred to as the “Act 1992”) assailing the judgment and order dated 9th August, 2007 passed by the Securities Appellate Tribunal(hereinafter being referred to as the “Tribunal”) affirming the order of the Securities and Exchange Board of India, Mumbai(hereinafter being referred to as the “Board”) dated 7th May, 2007 holding that the appellant did not satisfy the conditions
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →