LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/geddam-jhansi-anr-vs-the-state-of-telangana-ors-20250207/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal · Reportable judgment

Geddam Jhansi & Anr. vs The State of Telangana & Ors.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
7 February 2025
Case No.
Criminal Appeal No. 609 of 2025
Result
Allowed
Bench
B.V. Nagarathna, N Kotiswar Singh
Citation
[2025] 3 S.C.R. 1 : 2025 INSC 160
Acts & Sections
CrPC IPC Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 Protection of Women from Domestic Violence…
Supreme Court Reports [2025] 3 S.C.R. 1 : 2025 INSC 160
Issue for consideration
Whether the criminal proceedings against the appellant(s) under Sections 498A, 506, Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 3 and 4, Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961; Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 ought to be quashed.
Headnote

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – s.482 – Quashing – Penal Code, 1860 – ss.498A, 506 – Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 – ss.3, 4 – Complainant made specific allegations against her husband and her mother-in-law for demand of dowry and harassment – However, as regards the appellants (complainant’s mother-in-law’s younger sister and her son), the allegation was that they pressurized her to act according to her husband and her mother-in-law’s wishes – High Court declined to quash criminal proceedings against the appellants – Challenge to: Held: Impugned judgements set aside – Charges against the accused including the appellants were sought to be substantiated based on the statements of the complainant, her parents and two panchayat elders – Complainant in her complaints did not assign any specific role to the appellants concerning cruelty, the demands of dowry or her physical and mental harassment except for making a sweeping allegation without specific details – Nothing on record to show that the parents or the two witnesses witnessed any of the incidents of physical harassment of the complainant at the instance of the appellants – Statements of the Panchayat elder is based on the information provided by the complainant’s father and is hearsay evidence – No prima facie case made out against the appellants for continuing the criminal proceedings against them in the trial – Pending criminal proceedings quashed qua the two appellants – Constitution of India – Article 142. [Paras 37, 23, 40] Matrimonial/domestic disputes – Criminalisation of domestic disputes, effect on the institution of family – Tendency to implicate family members/relatives – Duty of Court, discussed – In criminal cases of domestic violence, complaints and charges to be specific. [Paras 31-35]

Keywords: Quashing · Cruelty · Demand for dowry · Physical and mental Harassment · Domestic violence · Harassment · Criminal intimidation · Panchayat witnesses · Identical statements of the witnesses · Generalised allegations · Matrimonial/domestic disputes · Criminal cases relating to domestic violence · Tendency to implicate family members/relatives · Institution of family · Abuse of the process of the law · Charge-sheet · Hearsay evidence

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Divya Pandey. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Judgment Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh, J. 1. Leave granted in both the SLPs. 2. This common order disposes of both the Criminal Appeals arising out of Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 9556 of 2022 and Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 428 of 2024 as both these appeals relate to similar and connected incidents. 3. Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 9556 of 2022 was filed against the judgement and order dated 04.04.2022 passed by the Ld. Single Bench of the High Court for the State of Telangana in Criminal Petition No. 3105 of 2022 whereunder the High Court declined to quash the c
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →