LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/dr-jagdish-prasad-ors-vs-state-of-uttar-pradesh-anr-20181203/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal · Reportable judgment

Dr. Jagdish Prasad & Ors. vs State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
3 December 2018
Case No.
Criminal Appeal No. 1542 of 2018
Bench
Abhay Manohar Sapre, Indu Malhotra
Citation
[2018] 14 S.C.R. 459 : 2018 INSC 1135
Supreme Court Reports [2018] 14 S.C.R. 459 : 2018 INSC 1135
Headnote

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s. 482 – Quashing of proceedings – Complaint filed against the appellant under ss.498A,

323 IPC and ss. 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 – Application for quashing of proceeding dismissed by High Court – On appeal, held: Single Judge of High Court quoted the principles of law laid down in several decisions relating to powers of the High Court under s.482 of the Code but did not refer to the facts of the case to appreciate the controversy of the case – Matter remitted to High Court for consideration afresh – Penal Code, 1860 – ss.498A,

323 – Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 – ss. 3 and 4.

Allowing the appeal and remanding the matter to High Court, the Court

HELD : The Single Judge ought to have first set out the brief facts of the case with a view to understand the factual matrix and then examined the challenge made to the proceedings in the light of the principles of law laid down by this Court with a view to record the findings on the grounds urged by the appellant as to whether any interference therein is called for or not. This exercise was not done by the High Court while passing the impugned order. [Paras 10 and 11][461-B-C]

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is filed against the final judgment and order dated 13.09.2018 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in an Application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as “the Code”) bearing No.35595 of 2017 whereby the Single Judge dismissed the application filed by the appellants herein. 3. Few facts need mention hereinbelow to appreciate the short controversy involved in this appeal. 4. By impugned order, the learned Single Judge dismissed
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →