LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/dilbag-rai-vs-the-state-of-haryana-ors-20181203/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal · Reportable judgment

Dilbag Rai vs The State of Haryana & Ors.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
3 December 2018
Case No.
Criminal Appeal No. 1509 of 2018
Result
Disposed
Bench
D.Y. Chandrachud, M.R. Shah
Citation
[2018] 14 S.C.R. 1138 : 2018 INSC 1139
Supreme Court Reports [2018] 14 S.C.R. 1138 : 2018 INSC 1139
Headnote

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s.482 – Quashing of FIR/criminal proceedings under – On facts, proceedings arising out of F.I.R. registered u/ss. 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 506 IPC – Quashed by the High Court on the ground that the complainant had failed to make out any criminal intent on the part of the accused – Justification of – Held: High Court was not justified in taking recourse to its power u/s. 482 to quash the proceedings – High Court lost sight of crucial aspects which emerged during the course of the investigation – It was complainant’s case that though the accused did not have title to the property, she had dealt with the property and it was on that basis that the complainant was induced to part with valuable consideration – Furthermore, the correctness of these allegations is a matter of trial – Thus, the order of the High Court is set aside.

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by DR. DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal arises from a judgment and order dated 11.2.2016 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana. By the impugned judgment, the High Court has quashed the proceedings arising out of F.I.R. No. 210 dated 21.6.2014 registered under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (“the Penal Code”) at Police Station Shahabad, District Kurukshetra. 3. The complainant is in appeal in these proceedings. The case of the appellant is that on 1.12.2011, the accused, wh
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →