LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/dashrath-jolo-anr-etc-vs-state-of-chhattisgarh-20180123/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal · Reportable judgment

Dashrath @ Jolo & Anr. etc. vs State of Chhattisgarh

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
23 January 2018
Case No.
Criminal Appeal Nos. 197-198 of 2018
Result
Dismissed
Bench
R.K. Agrawal, R. Banumathi
Citation
[2018] 1 S.C.R. 368 : 2018 INSC 51
Supreme Court Reports [2018] 1 S.C.R. 368 : 2018 INSC 51
Headnote

Penal Code, 1860 – s.302 r/w s.149 – Murder – Unlawful assembly – On facts, death of three persons and injuries to two by the appellants – Appellants found guilty of forming unlawful assembly armed with deadly weapons, with the common object to commit murder of three and attempt to commit murder of PW 19 – Conviction u/s. 302 read with s. 149 and sentenced to life imprisonment as also convicted for other offences – High Court upheld the order of the trial court – On appeal, held: Both the trial court as well as the High Court accepted the evidence of PW-19, injured eye-witness, whose evidence stands on a higher footing – Weapons were also recovered from the appellants – Considering the circumstances and the entire incident, it cannot be said that the complainant party were the aggressors and that the appellants acted in self defence – The submission that failure of the prosecution to explain the injuries on the person of the appellants fatal to the prosecution case, cannot be accepted – It cannot be held as a matter of law or invariably a rule that whenever the accused sustained an injury in the same occurrence, the prosecution is obliged to explain the injury and on the failure of the prosecution to do so, the prosecution case should be disbelieved – Further, the injuries sustained by the appellants were simple in nature and answers elicited from the doctors that those injuries found on the accused could be self inflicted – Thus, upon appreciation of evidence and on well considered reasonings, the courts below rightly convicted the appellants – Evidence.

Takhaji Hiraji v. Thakore Kubersing Chamansing (2001) 6 SCC 145 – referred to.

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The Order of the Court was delivered by R. BANUMATHI, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. These appeals arise out of the judgment dated 13.05.2014 passed by the High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissing the criminal appeal Nos.59899/2009 thereby confirming the conviction and sentence passed by the trial court. 3. Briefly stated case of the prosecution is that, on 03.08.2008 at about 1.30 p.m., PW-19-Birichram went to the house of one Bhojram for inviting him for the sixth day birth of his child (chhati). The appellants who are neighbours of Bhojram and were standing in front of their houses, threatened PW-
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →