LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/case-details-mohar-singh-dead-through-lrs-ors-vs-state-of-uttar-pradesh-collector-ors-20231107/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Case Details Mohar Singh (Dead) through Lrs. & Ors. vs State of Uttar Pradesh Collector & Ors.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
7 November 2023
Case No.
Civil Appeal Nos.7504-7505 of 2023
Result
Allowed
Bench
Surya Kant, Dipankar Datta
Citation
[2023] 14 S.C.R. 842 : 2023 INSC 1019
Supreme Court Reports [2023] 14 S.C.R. 842 : 2023 INSC 1019
Issue for consideration
Appellants if entitled to seek parity with their co-villagers in the grant of compensation for their acquired land despite the inordinate delay in filing first appeals.
Headnote

Land Acquisition Act, 1894 – Compensation – Parity sought with co-villagers – Delay of 13 years in filing of the first appeals – Condonation:

Held: Appellants are entitled to seek parity with their co-villagers in the grant of compensation for their acquired land – The inordinate delay in filing appeal in compensatory matters, per se, may not be fatal as the rights and equities between the parties can be well balanced by denying the statutory benefits, such as interest for the delayed period – Thus, the delay in filing the first appeal(s) could be condoned subject to the condition that the appellants would not be entitled to enure undue benefit for the delayed period – Such indulgence is being granted in the appellant’s favour also because a batch of first appeals at the instance of other land owners was still pending consideration before the High Court – The delay of nearly 13 years in filing of their first appeals is being condoned, only to accord parity between the similarly placed land-owners on the anvil of Article 14 – If the appellants are granted compensation higher than their co-landowners, despite the fact that such counterparts were vigilant in pursuing their remedy promptly, it will lead to hostile discrimination viz those landowners whose fate already stands sealed upto this Court and will amount to granting premium on stale, belated and chance claim of the appellants – Appellants entitled to compensation @ Rs.150 per sq. yard for their respective acquired land – However, the compensation amount shall not include statutory interest, including on solatium, as per the rate prescribed u/s.34 of the Act for the period from the date of passing of the award by the Reference Court u/s.18 of the Act till the filing of the respective first appeals before the High Court – Constitution of India – Article 14.[Paras 12-14 and 15] LIST OF CITATIONS AND OTHER REFERENCES

Jitendra and others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another C.A. No.12631/2017 – referred to.

OTHER CASE DETAILS INCLUDING IMPUGNED

ORDER AND APPEARANCES

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

JUDGMENT / ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT JUDGMENT 1. Leave granted. 2. The land of the appellants, situated in village Khora, Pargana Loni, Tehsil Dadri, District Ghaziabad, was part and parcel of the total land measuring 902.2046 acres which was proposed to be acquired by a notification dated 17.03.1988 published on 19.03.1988 under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (in short, “the Act”). It appears that finally, land measuring 337.892 acres only, including that of the appellants, was acquired and the award was passed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer on 01.02.1991, grantin
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →