LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/bimla-tiwari-vs-state-of-bihar-ors-20230116/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal · Reportable judgment

Bimla Tiwari vs State of Bihar & Ors.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
16 January 2023
Case No.
SLP (Criminal) No. 834 – 835 of 2023
Result
Disposed
Bench
Dinesh Maheshwari, Hrishikesh Roy
Citation
[2023] 1 S.C.R. 501 : 2023 INSC 45
Supreme Court Reports [2023] 1 S.C.R. 501 : 2023 INSC 45
Headnote

Bail – Pre-arrest bail and regular bail – Grant of – Considerations – Held: The process of criminal law cannot be utilised for armtwisting and money recovery, particularly while opposing the prayer for bail – The question as to whether prearrest bail, or for that matter regular bail, in a given case is to be granted or not is required to be examined and the discretion is required to be exercised by the Court with reference to the material on record and the parameters governing bail considerations – In a given case, the concession of pre-arrest bail or regular bail could be declined even if the accused has made payment of the money involved or offers to make any payment – Conversely, in a given case, the concession of pre-arrest bail or regular bail could be granted irrespective of any payment or any offer of payment – Ordinarily, there is no justification in adopting such a course that for the purpose of being given the concession of pre-arrest bail, the person apprehending arrest ought to make payment – Recovery of money is essentially within the realm of civil proceedings – Criminal Law.

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The following Order of the Court was passed: ORDER 1. Permission to file petitions for special leave is granted. 2. By way of these petitions, the petitioner/informant seeks to question the order dated 14.11.2022 as passed by the High Court of Judicature at Patna in Crl. Misc. Case No. 15125 of 2022 and 19515 of 2022, whereby the High Court took note of the offer made by the accusedrespondent No. 2, of making payment of a sum of Rs.75,000/- (seventyfive thousand) to the petitioner/informant and, considering such an offer and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case pertainin
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →