LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/ayyub-ors-vs-state-of-uttar-pradesh-anr-20250207/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal · Reportable judgment

Ayyub & Ors. vs State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
7 February 2025
Case No.
Criminal Appeal No. 461 of 2025
Result
Allowed
Bench
Sanjiv Khanna, Sanjay Kumar, K.V. Viswanathan
Citation
[2025] 2 S.C.R. 452 : 2025 INSC 168
Acts & Sections
IPC CrPC
Supreme Court Reports [2025] 2 S.C.R. 452 : 2025 INSC 168
Issue for consideration
Issue arose as regards the correctness of the order of High Court declining to quash the proceedings against the appellants u/s.306, Penal Code, 1860.
Headnote

Penal Code, 1860 – s.306 – Abetment of suicide – When not – FIR filed by first appellant-father of ‘Z’ against family of ‘T’ alleging that on suspicion of his relationship with ‘T’ they had beaten ‘Z’ with sticks and fists as a result of which he died – R-2 (cousin brother of ‘T’) filed FIR against the appellants for abetment of suicide of ‘T’ alleging that through verbal utterances they humiliated and tortured ‘T’ and she committed suicide – Offence u/s.306, if made out against the appellants:

Held: No – None of the ingredients required to make out a case u/s.306 is even remotely mentioned in the charge-sheet or borne out from the material on record – There is only one sided version of the complainant-R-2– Charge-sheet proceeded in an unidimensional manner by accepting the version of R-2 and his family members as the gospel truth – Even if the utterance attributed to the appellants is assumed to be true it cannot be said to be of such a nature as to leave the deceased with no other alternative but to put an end to her life – No investigation was done to explore any other angle – The prior lodging of the FIR by the first appellant against the family of ‘T’ for the death of his son ‘Z’ indicates an element of desperation on the part of R-2 to somehow implicate the appellants – Reliance of the statements u/s.161, CrPC belatedly also reinforces the suspicion of one-sided, partial and inimical investigation– Reinvestigation directed – Proceedings against the appellants quashed. [Paras 15, 16, 21, 22, 24]

Penal Code, 1860 – ss.306, 107 – Ingredients of s.306 – Discussed.

Keywords: Section 306 of Penal Code, 1860 · Abetment of Suicide · Ingredients of Section 306 of Penal Code, 1860 · Incitement to commit suicide · Intention · Aid or instigate or abet · Suspected Relationship · Verbal utterances · Insult · Humiliated · Tortured · Alleged harassment · No other alternative · ‘go and die’ · Quashing · One-sided, partial and inimical investigation · Reinvestigation · Unnatural Death

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Divya Pandey. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Judgment K.V. Viswanathan, J. 1. The present criminal appeal calls in question the correctness of the order dated 27.07.2023 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. No. 25969 of 2023. By the said order, the High Court declined to quash the proceedings instituted against the appellants under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC’). 2. The facts of the case are rather unfortunate. It has its origin in a suspected relationship between the son of the first appellant, one Ziaul Rahman (since deceased) and Tanu (since decea
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →