LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/arvind-kejriwal-vs-directorate-of-enforcement-20240510/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal · Reportable judgment

Arvind Kejriwal vs Directorate of Enforcement

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
10 May 2024
Case No.
Criminal Appeal No. 2493 of 2024
Bench
Sanjiv Khanna, Dipankar Datta
Citation
[2024] 6 S.C.R. 346 : 2024 INSC 400
Acts & Sections
Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 IPC
Supreme Court Reports [2024] 6 S.C.R. 346 : 2024 INSC 400
Issue for consideration
Whether the Appellant is entitled to grant of interim bail/release during the pendency of the Appeal challenging his arrest by the Directorate of Enforcement, on account of an intervening factor i.e. 18th Lok Sabha General Elections.
Headnote

Bail – Interim Bail during the pendency of Appeal – Court to consider peculiarities associated with person in question and surrounding circumstances – Appellant has not been convicted, no criminal antecedents – Question of legality and validity of arrest sub judice – Interim bail granted. Held: Appellant arrested on 21.03.2024 by Directorate of Enforcement – Arrest upheld by trial court and High Court – Order and judgment challenged – Questions relating to legality and validity of arrest sub judice – Power to grant interim bail – 18th Lok Sabha General Elections is an intervening factor – More holistic and libertarian view justified – While examining the question of grant of interim bail, courts to consider peculiarities associated with person in question and surrounding circumstances – Appellant is the Chief Minister of Delhi and leader of one of the national parties – He has not been convicted and has no criminal antecedents – Investigation pending since August 2022 – Grant of interim bail to Appellant does not give premium of placing the politicians in a benefic position compared to ordinary citizens – Interim bail granted subject to terms and conditions. [Paras 7, 8, 15] Bail – Grant of Interim Bail – Terms and Conditions: Held: Interim Bail granted subject to terms and conditions – Appellant to surrender on 02.06.2024 – Bail bonds with surety to be furnished – Appellant not to visit the Office of the Chief Minister and the Delhi Secretariat – Appellant bound by statement made on his behalf that he shall not sign official files unless it is required and necessary for obtaining clearance/ approval of the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi – Appellant will not make any comment with regard to his role in the present case – Appellant will not interact with any of the witnesses and/or have access to any official files connected with the case. [Para 18]

Keywords: Interim Bail · Interim suspension of sentence

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Prastut Mahesh Dalvi, Hony. Associate Editor (Verified by: Shibani Ghosh, Adv.). Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Order Leave granted. 2. Arvind Kejriwal in this appeal has challenged the order and judgment passed by the trial court and the High Court of Delhi, upholding his arrest by the Directorate of Enforcement 1 on 21.03.2024. 3. A number of legal pleas and issues have been raised, including the scope and violation of Section 19 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. We have heard learned counsel appearing for both the appellant as well as DoE at some length, albeit hearing is yet to conclude and considered decision will take time. 4. In view of the prolongation of proceedings, in the h
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →