LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/amanatullah-khan-vs-the-commissioner-of-police-delhi-ors-criminal-appeal-no-2349-of-2024-20240507/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal · Reportable judgment

Amanatullah Khan vs The Commissioner of Police, Delhi & Ors. Criminal Appeal No. 2349 of 2024

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
7 May 2024
Case No.
Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 5719/2023
Bench
Surya Kant, K.V. Viswanathan
Citation
[2024] 5 S.C.R. 927 : 2024 INSC 383
Acts & Sections
Constitution Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of… Punjab Police Rules 1934
Supreme Court Reports [2024] 5 S.C.R. 927 : 2024 INSC 383
Issue for consideration
Whether the names of the Appellant’s minor children and his wife against whom there is no adverse material should be included in the History Sheet of the Appellant.
Headnote

Punjab Police Rules 1934 (As applicable to NCT of Delhi), rule 23.8 and rule 23.9 – Format of history sheet – Need to revisit archaic rules – Amended Standing Order issued on 21.03.2024 – In column on ‘relations and connections’ only those persons who can provide shelter to history sheeter to be reflected – Names of associates in crime, abettors and receivers to be included – No details of minor relatives shall be recorded anywhere in History Sheet – Unless there is evidence that minor has afforded shelter – Value for human dignity and life deeply embedded in Article 21 of Constitution – Expression ‘life’ unequivocally includes the right to live a life worthy of human honour and all that goes along with it.

Held: Writ Petition filed by Appellant under A. 226 Constitution r/w s. 482 CrPC for quashing of ‘History Sheet’ opened against him – Petition dismissed by High Court – Judgment challenged – original Standing Order of 10.06.2022 under ‘preparation of History Sheet’ replicated from archaic Punjab Police Rules 1934 – Amended Standing Order issued on 21.03.2024 – Provides certain safeguards: inclusion of names of only such persons who can afford history sheeter shelter when on the run from police – Names of associates in crime, abettors and receivers to be included – No details of any minor relatives, i.e., son, daughter, siblings shall be recorded anywhere – Unless there is evidence that such minor has afforded shelter – s.74 of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 to be meticulously followed – Clarifies ‘History Sheet’ is an internal police document, not a publicly accessible report. [Paras 6-7]

Appeal partly allowed – Impugned High Court judgment stands modified – Amended Standing Order will prevent undesirable exposure of Appellant’s minor children – Amended Standing Order to be given effect forthwith in Appellant’s case – Direction given to Commissioner of Police, Delhi to designate a senior police officer of the rank of Joint Commissioner of Police or above, to periodically audit contents of History Sheets, ensure confidentiality, and delete names of persons/children found innocent during investigation from “relations and connections” category in History Sheet – Prompt action to be taken against any police officer acting contrary to amended Standing Order. [Paras 9-13]

Read the full headnote (1 more paragraph)

Exercising suo moto powers, scope of proceedings expanded to police authorities in other states and UTs – To consider undesirability of the practice of mechanically including names of innocent individuals, by virtue of hailing from a particular socially, economically and educationally disadvantaged background – Allegation of police diaries being maintained selectively of individuals of vimukta jatis, based solely on caste bias – State Governments to take necessary preventive measures to safeguard such communities – Pre-conceived notions render them ‘invisible victims’ – May often impede their right to live a life with selfrespect – value for human dignity and life is deeply embedded in Article 21 – Expression ‘life’ under a. 21 includes right to live a life worthy of human honour – Self-regard, social image, honest space for oneself in surrounding society, just as significant to dignified life as are adequate food, clothing and shelter. [Paras 14-15] Periodic audit mechanism overseen by senior police officer as directed for NCT of Delhi – Critical tool to review and scrutinize entries to check for biases and discriminatory practice – Can help eliminate such deprecated practices – States/Union Territories not before the Court – No positive mandamus can be issued – Urged to revisit their policy-regime and consider whether suitable amendments on pattern of ‘Delhi Model’ are required to be made. [Paras 16-17]

Keywords: History Sheet · ‘Relations and connections’ · Article 21 · Right to live with dignity · Right to live a life worthy of human honour

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Aandrita Deb, Hony. Associate Editor (Verified by: Shibani Ghosh, Adv.). Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Judgment Surya Kant, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The appellant approached the High Court of Delhi through a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of the ‘History Sheet’ opened against him and the proposal to declare him as ‘Bad Character’ with the entry of his name in the Surveillance ‘Register-X, Part II, Bundle A’ at Police Station Jamia Nagar, District: South-East, Delhi. The Single Judge of High Court has, vide the impugned judgment dated 19.01.2023, dismissed the appellant’s writ petition, gi
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →