LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/yogesh-madhav-makalwad-vs-the-state-of-maharashtra-ors-20250812/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Yogesh Madhav Makalwad vs The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
12 August 2025
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 10531 of 2025
Result
Allowed
Bench
Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai, Satish Chandra Sharma, K. Vinod Chandran
Citation
[2025] 8 S.C.R. 750 : 2025 INSC 964
Supreme Court Reports [2025] 8 S.C.R. 750 : 2025 INSC 964
Issue for consideration
Issue arose as regards the judgment passed by the High Court upholding the order passed by the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee confiscating and invalidating the Caste Certificate of the appellant and his father for the Scheduled Tribe-Koli Mahadev.
Headnote

Social status certificate – Scheduled Tribe Certificate – Caste claim – Confiscation and invalidation – Appellant-student became eligible to medical admission on basis of caste claim of belonging to Koli Mahadev tribe, however his caste certificate, had not been validated till then – Appellant filed writ petition seeking direction for scrutinizing his Caste Certificate – During the pendency, the Scrutiny Committee invalidated the claim of the appellant and his father disbelieving various documents placed on record-School Admission and Leaving Extract of the appellant’s grandfather from the year 1943, the school records of the appellant’s father and appellant’s uncle, and their certificates were cancelled and impounded by the Scrutiny Committee – Appellant then amended the writ petition challenging the order passed by the Scrutiny Committee confiscating and invalidating the Caste Certificate of the appellant and his father for the Scheduled Tribe – High Court dismissed the petition – Sustainability: Held: Appellant belongs to the Koli Mahadev Tribe – Words Koli Mahadev written in the entry are in the same ink and in the same handwriting, thus, no scope for interpolation in the said entry – On the basis of this pre-Independence entry, the school records of the appellant’s father and his uncle also show the caste as Koli Mahadev – In view of the pre-Independence document which certifies that the appellant’s grandfather to be belonging to Koli Mahadev Tribe, a greater probative value ought to have been given to the said document, however, on the basis of presumptions and assumptions, the said document was disbelieved – As regards the affinity test, with the change in times, migration and modernisation, the joining of people from the tribal population in the mainstream of the society, the fact that they are not in a position to recollect the anthropological and ethnological traits, deity, rituals, customs, mode of marriage, death ceremonies, method of burial, etc., of their tribe cannot be solely a ground ipso facto to deny the said claim – Affinity test is not a litmus test to decide the caste claim and is not an essential part in the process of determination of correctness of a caste or tribe claim in every case – Thus, the order of the Scrutiny Committee invalidating the appellant’s caste claim as well as the order of High Court not sustainable in law – Order passed by the High Court quashed and set aside – Scrutiny Committee to issue Caste Validity Certificate to the appellant. [Paras 10-17]

Keywords: Schedule Tribe Certificate · Confiscation and invalidation of the Caste Certificate · Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee · Pre-independence document · Affinity test · Caste Certificate · School Admission and Leaving Extract · School records · Scheduled TribeKoli Mahadev · Scrutinization of the Caste Certificate · Interpolation in the entry · Probative value · Presumptions and assumptions · Affinity test · Migration and modernisation · Tribal population · Anthropological and ethnological traits

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Nidhi Jain. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Judgment B.R. Gavai, CJI FACTUAL ASPECT 1. Leave granted. 2. The present appeal challenges the judgment and final order dated 23rd July, 2024 passed by the learned Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad1 in Writ Petition No. 8702 of 2019. Vide the impugned judgment and final order, the High Court dismissed the petition challenging the order dated 24th June, 2019 passed by the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad Division, Aurangabad2 confiscating and invalidating the Caste Certificate of the appellant and his father for the Sched
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →