LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/usha-ananthasubramanian-vs-union-of-india-20200212/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Usha Ananthasubramanian vs Union of India

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
12 February 2020
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 7604 of 2019
Result
Allowed
Bench
R.F. Nariman, S. Ravindra Bhat, V. Ramasubramanian
Citation
[2020] 3 S.C.R. 882 : 2020 INSC 176
Supreme Court Reports [2020] 3 S.C.R. 882 : 2020 INSC 176
Headnote

Companies Act, 1956: ss. 241, 337, 339 – Application to tribunal for relief in cases of oppression, etc. – Charge sheet filed by CBI against several persons occupying positions in the Punjab National Bank as well as the Directors of a company – Criminal case against the appellant-MD and CEO of the Bank that she omitted to take precautions or preventive steps to prevent the fraud perpetrated by Nirav Modi and thereby committed mis-conduct and conspiracy with the other accused persons – Orders passed by NCLT and NCLAT in exercise of its jurisdiction u/s. 241 freezing the assets of the appellant – On appeal, held: Powers u/ss. 241, 337 and 339 cannot possibly be utilized in order that a person who may be the head of some other organization be roped in, and his or her assets be attached – Thus, the order passed by the NCLAT and well as the NCLT set aside.

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by R. F. NARIMAN, J. 1) The present appeal is by Usha Anandhasubramanian - former MD & CEO of the Punjab National Bank. She was MD & CEO of the said Bank from 14.08.2015 to 05.05.2017. 2) A charge sheet has been filed by the CBI against several persons occupying positions in the Punjab National Bank as well as the Directors of Gitanjali Gems Ltd. 3) Mr. C.S. Vaidyanathan, learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of the appellant, points out that the charge sheet by the CBI itself makes it clear that at the highest even the criminal case against th
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →